tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post3508519172616793132..comments2024-02-24T18:44:39.324-08:00Comments on Trials & Tribulations: The "Crimes" of Nadya SulemanSprockethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03837416113512618694noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-75970790086511382332009-03-01T21:29:00.000-08:002009-03-01T21:29:00.000-08:00Getting those hideous fish-lips on taxpayer money ...Getting those hideous fish-lips on taxpayer money should be against the law.<BR/><BR/>If it's not considered fraud, it should be considered a violation of aesthetic standards.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-45849015353740160432009-02-24T10:40:00.000-08:002009-02-24T10:40:00.000-08:00It appears she committed fraud multiple times and ...It appears she committed fraud multiple times and should be charged with such.<BR/>She took government funds that were meant to go to children and paid for fertility treatments, cosmetic surgeries, and such. It also appears to be some sort of child neglect going on. She constantly lies, so it is difficult to believe her what she says to defend herself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-65155873923577738382009-02-22T01:39:00.000-08:002009-02-22T01:39:00.000-08:00On February 19, 2009 12:50 PM Anonymous Anonymous...<I>On February 19, 2009 12:50 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...<BR/><BR/> Just for the record, I believe it was using in vitro fertilization to have 8 children, not 9 or 7.</I><BR/><BR/>The 8th baby was a surprise to everyone, so she <B>THOUGHT</B> she was carrying 7 babies. I'm not sure if she was implanted with 6 embryos and 2 of them split or if she was implanted with 7 and one of them split (I think she's been deliberately vague on that point and I may have missed a clarification), but at least 2 of the babies are twins.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-68311454473650063552009-02-21T10:37:00.000-08:002009-02-21T10:37:00.000-08:00There's possibly multiple counts of fraud committe...There's possibly multiple counts of fraud committed against the agencies providing food stamps and other aid. The amounts are usually decreased if there's parental support, which she might have misrepresented. Also, if she's using available money to have surgeries and implantations, instead of supporting her children, that's fraud. Also, she shouldn't be classified as disabled if she's shooting out babies all those years. That's fraud.<BR/><BR/>Wonder if she will be fined or be made to repay money from the government. She's probably counting on getting some sort of exploitative publicity deal, but she's not counting on ever paying back all these misspent funds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-89611738118488770282009-02-21T08:05:00.000-08:002009-02-21T08:05:00.000-08:00Her "wonderful" church is an enabler.As are her pa...Her "wonderful" church is an enabler.<BR/><BR/>As are her parents.<BR/><BR/>Criminal enablers.<BR/><BR/>And should be considered for criminal charges of aiding and abetting, or harboring a criminal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-83337689593756904762009-02-19T12:50:00.000-08:002009-02-19T12:50:00.000-08:00Just for the record, I believe it was using in vit...Just for the record, I believe it was using in vitro fertilization to have 8 children, not 9 or 7.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-60638236106363140252009-02-17T22:18:00.000-08:002009-02-17T22:18:00.000-08:00It seems to me that if a woman deliberately become...It seems to me that if a woman deliberately becomes pregnant with more babies than a human being can be expected to carry to term, when there is no hope WHATSOEVER of doing so, she is willfully endangering the lives of her fetuses. WILLFULLY. There has to be SOME kind of criminal charge that fits the bill. <BR/><BR/>Knowing in advance, before she even became pregnant (by artificial means) that she had NO HOPE of EVER being able to pay the significant medical costs that are GUARANTEED to be incurred in such a risky endeavor should be considered fraud of some kind. She KNEW that all 7 babies she thought she was carrying would need long-term, specialized medical care and chose to place that burden on the taxpayers. <BR/><BR/>If it can be proved that she and her doctor cooked up some sort of scheme to carry these babies for the express purpose of exploiting the babies, there may be some sort of conspiracy charge that could be applied.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-32141898785877050732009-02-17T22:03:00.000-08:002009-02-17T22:03:00.000-08:00Three of her younger children attend Whittier Chri...Three of her younger children attend Whittier Christian Preschool it was written by a commenter whose children attend school with them.<BR/><BR/>All the kids had on Whittier Christian School t-shirts.<BR/><BR/>http://www.whittierchristian.org/fil_files/67.pdf<BR/><BR/>http://www.whittierchristian.org/fil_files/66.pdf<BR/><BR/>Please explain to me who is paying for this. Let's say Grandpa pitches in (as it was reported he does for a "special school for the autistic child), does that mean that the money he is WILLING to pay for private schools but he is unwilling to pay for food for $490 worth of food, etc etc. This is beyond screwy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-5761871632037814792009-02-17T19:59:00.000-08:002009-02-17T19:59:00.000-08:00Using in vitro fertilization to have 9 children is...Using in vitro fertilization to have 9 children is so extreme and unpleasant for the would be mother that it is self limiting as a behavior.<BR/><BR/>I don’t think as a society that we need to get our collective knickers in a twist over a stupid thing that one mother did once.<BR/><BR/>Since it is not likely to be repeated, the case does not justify new legislation. <BR/><BR/>There is also the issue of equal protection.<BR/><BR/>Several polygamist compounds reportedly encourage multiple wife households to have as many children as possible so the women (who are technically single) are eligible for a monthly welfare amount for each child—thereby supporting large homes.<BR/><BR/>Welfare mothers in general have littlie incentive to practice birth control for the same reasons.<BR/><BR/>So how can you prosecute this one mother? <BR/><BR/>And how do you limit a woman’s right to bear children?<BR/><BR/>A right only available to the rich?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com