tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post5447969115713907747..comments2024-03-18T03:14:26.822-07:00Comments on Trials & Tribulations: Phil Spector Retrial: Day Thirty-five, Phil Spector SpeaksSprockethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03837416113512618694noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-60974279274414228432009-02-01T17:59:00.000-08:002009-02-01T17:59:00.000-08:00Betsy, please, oh please, tell us more about what ...Betsy, please, oh please, tell us more about what happened on Thursday between AJ and SJ. Joe Friday is nice but you're the one I trust for an opinion and I need it bad!!! (I'm a sprocketolic...)<BR/><BR/>Pierre AKA NanoukAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-62716658152875387832009-01-31T13:39:00.000-08:002009-01-31T13:39:00.000-08:00Did RS say "because the employee was looking at he...Did RS say "because the employee was looking at her husbands private photos" or "because the employee was looking at photos of her husband's privates"?<BR/><BR/>Yechhhhh...<BR/><BR/>NanoukAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-88531468020235994232009-01-30T22:51:00.000-08:002009-01-30T22:51:00.000-08:00To: Anonymous at 4:28 pm on January 30th, 2009:I a...To: Anonymous at 4:28 pm on January 30th, 2009:<BR/><BR/>I apologize if I conveyed<BR/>a sense of lenity towards <BR/>Mr. A.J. Jenkins, for that was not my intention at all. I hope to accurately convey this point: it is glaringly obvious to me that Ms. Rachelle Marie Short place anything or anyone in the way of her having to face the consequences of her chuckleheaded and doltish antics. Ms. Rachelle Marie Short is a boorish clod!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-80924974161125182022009-01-30T22:30:00.000-08:002009-01-30T22:30:00.000-08:00Was Friday a court day or was Thursday the last da...Was Friday a court day or was Thursday the last day this week?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-40620373320322734372009-01-30T20:41:00.000-08:002009-01-30T20:41:00.000-08:00Susan:There are times when it does take all my wil...Susan:<BR/>There are times when it does take all my willpower to maintain a straight face.<BR/><BR/>Anon @ 4:26 pm:<BR/>The fountain issue has not been resolved yet.<BR/><BR/>Yes there was testimony. I'm sorry that I have sewing orders I need to get out before I can write up Thursdays notes.Sprockethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03837416113512618694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-91806414997697191922009-01-30T16:28:00.000-08:002009-01-30T16:28:00.000-08:00Don't feel too sorry for A.J. Jenkins--he is after...Don't feel too sorry for A.J. Jenkins--he is after all getting $4,000 a week to protect his clients.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-9129871393631959322009-01-30T16:26:00.000-08:002009-01-30T16:26:00.000-08:00Great gosssip and all, but was there any actual te...Great gosssip and all, but was there any actual testimony or rulings from the court, like did the investogator confirm that the fountain has one speed?<BR/><BR/>Will the fountan be on or off at the site visit?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-42078771419550278032009-01-30T15:51:00.000-08:002009-01-30T15:51:00.000-08:00Sprocket--I do not know how you can keep from laug...Sprocket--I do not know how you can keep from laughing when Rachelle goes into her "my husband" routine.<BR/><BR/>We know the goofball is her husband--maybe she says it to remind HIM!!<BR/><BR/>Unbelievable--and I would think that after this is all over, no matter how it turns out, no one would want pictures.<BR/><BR/>I love your blogging. Thank you for keeping us entertained.Susanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05559060504098259089noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-44853522332781384652009-01-30T14:42:00.000-08:002009-01-30T14:42:00.000-08:00OMG. I truly wish I was there with ya Sprocket. ...OMG. I truly wish I was there with ya Sprocket. This has to be the trial of the severely dysfunctional human impersonators.<BR/>I wonder if either Mr. or Mrs. Spector ever had a normal day in either of their pathetic lives. They make zoo animals look like Albert Einstein.sharihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00372975265112892344noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-14738284998222892182009-01-30T11:43:00.000-08:002009-01-30T11:43:00.000-08:00Once again, this transpirationdemonstrates that Ms...Once again, this transpiration<BR/>demonstrates that Ms. Rachelle Marie Short will not take any responsibility for her own lunkheaded actions.<BR/>Instead, Mr. A.J. Jenkins has become the patsy for Ms. Rachelle Marie Short's display of duncery.<BR/><BR/>It is my hope that Ms. Vania Stuelp<BR/>will pursue charges against Ms. Rachelle Marie Short who is a complete dotard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-46602591765110744002009-01-30T08:11:00.000-08:002009-01-30T08:11:00.000-08:00Sprocket.....EXCELLENT coverage *bows*Sprocket.....EXCELLENT coverage *bows*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-80399735635711783602009-01-30T07:40:00.000-08:002009-01-30T07:40:00.000-08:00ret FL PI:I was mistaken. It was the bodyguard wh...ret FL PI:<BR/><BR/>I was mistaken. It was the bodyguard who was taking the pictures and the court employee collected it from him. Now it all makes sense. Rachelle grabbed the camera out of the employee's hand and started deleting the photos. So, by the time they went in front of the Judge, the court employee no longer had possession of the camera.<BR/><BR/>It explains why the bodyguard had legal representation in front of Judge Fidler. <BR/><BR/>I'm wondering if Rachelle, knowing photos were not allowed to be taken, told the bodyguard to take the photos so she could avoid future trouble?Sprockethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03837416113512618694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-91989261404416621942009-01-30T07:23:00.000-08:002009-01-30T07:23:00.000-08:00MI don't know why the judge did not impound th...MI don't know why the judge did not impound the camera as evidence, at that time all the photos would be subject to the scrutiny of the law. As with any digital media, deleted items are still their, just as available space to be reused. Any time evidence that can be lost if not immediately secured it is subject to collection without a search warrant because of its vulnerability. No tellin what is in that camera, EGOS what they are with those people I doubt they even used the opportunity to destroy the data. At minimal MRS S and bodyguard could be charged with interference of a county employee in the performance of their job. Doesen't have to be a LEO. Just the fact that she stated she deleted photos indicates she took photos, deleting them is tampering with evidence. Fidler has way more Patience that I would or doesn't want to give SP anything for appeal. I would not be surprised if he doesn't deal with her after the trial. Their is a photo opp for you MR & MRS S in matching outfits!ret FL PIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15199916281521008627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-83416185360003815332009-01-30T06:54:00.000-08:002009-01-30T06:54:00.000-08:00I was mistaken! Harriet Ryan has a short entry in...I was mistaken! Harriet Ryan has a short entry in the LA Times Blog. It was the BODYGUARD who was taking the photos! Now it makes sense why the bodyguard had legal representation in front of the court. When the court employee confiscated the camera, that's when Rachelle grabbed it from her.Sprockethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03837416113512618694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-1205462868077384792009-01-30T03:30:00.000-08:002009-01-30T03:30:00.000-08:00So Rachelle is playing the aggressor and he's play...So Rachelle is playing the aggressor and he's playing the victim.<BR/><BR/>Wonder if the roles ever switch between these two. Whatever, she's his alter-ego.. <BR/>What kind of a person talks back to a judge like that? Ten to one she's convicted herself of some crime down the road...<BR/><BR/>Can't wait to see Weinberg's face when his little rat of a victim is convicted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-23576536076498952542009-01-30T01:13:00.000-08:002009-01-30T01:13:00.000-08:00Cucumber Joe,That tongue-in-cheek comment...pricel...Cucumber Joe,<BR/><BR/>That tongue-in-cheek comment...<BR/><BR/>priceless!!!!!donchaishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10633448176681880930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-3918266425835493292009-01-30T00:57:00.000-08:002009-01-30T00:57:00.000-08:00The important part of this is to determine how far...The important part of this is to determine how far Mrs Spector was away from the camera when it went off. There is a report that a court officer saw the flash then moments later heard her say 'I think I photographed somebody'. Of course he could be mistaken, perhaps he had a fountain pen in each ear.<BR/>She does have a history of pointing a camera at people without permission, but her defence are questioning if this has any relevance to this recent event.<BR/>Experts are being consulted by her defence, and it is believed that they can prove that actually the person being photographed was indeed photographing themselves - it was a self-inflicted photo shot.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10261503999139676579noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-59200034175810668302009-01-30T00:27:00.000-08:002009-01-30T00:27:00.000-08:00OGMAFB!OGMAFB!donchaishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10633448176681880930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-2608146384778496382009-01-29T23:23:00.000-08:002009-01-29T23:23:00.000-08:00Since this is her second warning re taking photos,...Since this is her second warning re taking photos, I'm surprised he hasn't banned her from the courthouse (with the exception of her having to appear before a judge there, that is). <BR/><BR/>She is 28.5 years old. She's not a child, but she certainly is a childish BRAT. Of course, she probably takes great PRIDE in being labeled as such, much like a teenager would.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-12265899350759799662009-01-29T22:46:00.000-08:002009-01-29T22:46:00.000-08:00CaliBride: Love how you adoptedMarc's nic for Rach...CaliBride: Love how you adopted<BR/>Marc's nic for Rachelle. "Rawhell"<BR/>sums it up nicely.<BR/><BR/>Sprocket: I do hope that the employee you mentioned takes it up with another court. Sounds like assault to me.<BR/><BR/>When PS "stuck up" for his wife,<BR/>MB had the same thought about it I did. Notice how it was all about PS, and what PS has done, none of it was really about his wife.<BR/>PS should let her be sent to jail.<BR/>She's not helping him at all at<BR/>this point. <BR/><BR/>Where was Weinberg's voice in all of this mess? <BR/><BR/>Best,<BR/>JohnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-38061400596271070472009-01-29T21:56:00.000-08:002009-01-29T21:56:00.000-08:00It will be interesting to see how Mr. and Mrs. Spe...It will be interesting to see how Mr. and Mrs. Spector react in the courtroom when he is convicted.<BR/><BR/>David from TNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-83443433854935790322009-01-29T21:34:00.001-08:002009-01-29T21:34:00.001-08:00I will try to put notes up over the weekend about ...I will try to put notes up over the weekend about the testimony today. I've been sewing this evening. I do have some sewing orders that I have to get in the mail tomorrow and other clients to see.<BR/><BR/>Many people have seen Rachelle taking pictures of Phil together with individuals who have come down to the court to support him. I observed Rachelle do this several times, once in the ante chamber area during voir dire. She was taking a photo of Spector with Donte.<BR/><BR/>There were no sanctions today, just the notice that if this happens again, someone is going to jail.<BR/><BR/>Anakerie:<BR/>At first, I just sat back and enjoyed the show. When Rachelle started talking back to the judge, as if she was within her right to grab that camera back because the employee was "looking at her husbands private photos," that's when I grabbed my pad and started to take notes. Spector standing up to speak was priceless.<BR/><BR/>Never a dull moment....outside the presence of the jury!Sprockethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03837416113512618694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-73140909965466728242009-01-29T21:34:00.000-08:002009-01-29T21:34:00.000-08:00MB: more ick. The slimy little worn wouldn't even ...MB: more ick. The slimy little worn wouldn't even take responsibility for having the chair cleaned? He wanted the State to pay for its cleaning? Nasty little prick. <BR/><BR/>I can't wait for your book which will fill us all in on the ickiness that is Harvey. Thank God you got out of there alive. *shudder*<BR/><BR/>He probably has "personal" photos of the murder scene with Lana in place as part of his memorabilia collection. <BR/><BR/>Karma. Let it arrive for Spector and the Trial Bride soon.CaliGirl9https://www.blogger.com/profile/06639398512708841968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-27347946258230632432009-01-29T21:12:00.000-08:002009-01-29T21:12:00.000-08:00Shed some light? Are you kidding the man is a nar...Shed some light? Are you kidding the man is a narcissistic prick of the worst kind and yes, he wanted the chair back but only if the PROS would have it cleaned first... so instead he had them replaced with replicas of the murder chair... really REALLY spooky. Acting like nothing happened and this is just a passing 'adventure' in his lifetime.<BR/><BR/>The irony to me, is that he stood up and defended HIMSELF about collecting memories... but not his stupid wife. Oy. And Ick is right.mControlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17971187498604889063noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6757696342634699253.post-3275898059563977952009-01-29T20:40:00.000-08:002009-01-29T20:40:00.000-08:00Wow, Sprocket!! You were treated to an unusual sho...Wow, Sprocket!! You were treated to an unusual show in the courtroom today, huh? LOL, I'm jealous! I would have loved to see those fireworks!<BR/><BR/>Amazing that Phil actually got up to defend the use of that camera in the courthouse... I have to wonder if he every actually <I>has</I> taken a picture in there or if it's all been Rachelle's doing. Why on earth would anyone take "memorabilia" photos in the courthouse where they are on trial for murder? Phil is even more of a ghoul than I thought!Anakeriehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11967316732261199319noreply@blogger.com