Showing posts with label Donal Re. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donal Re. Show all posts

Saturday, January 4, 2014

Gerhard Becker Plea and Sentencing

 Firefighter Glenn Allen's badge and memorial photo,
worn by a fellow firefighter at Becker's sentencing.

UPDATED 3:00 PM: clarity, spelling
January 3, 2014
It was a week ago when I first learned that Becker would be taking a plea on the involuntary manslaughter charge. Today, when I was walking up to the front entrance of the criminal court building I saw four uniformed firefighters. As I was clearing security, more firefighters started arriving, along with what looked like friends and family members.

Up on the 9th floor, the security station hasn't opened yet. There's a camera man in line in front of me along with City News reporter, Terri Keith. Behind me are several friends and/or family members and a line of firefighters in uniform. Defense attorney Donald Re is here, speaking to another (friend?) attorney of Becker's, Jay Gottfriedson (sp?) who attended a few days of the prelim last year. I wonder when Becker will arrive.

Gerhard Becker, at a prior pretrial hearing, 2012

8:06 AM
The security station staff arrive. I clear security and take a seat beside Terri Keith in the hallway right outside Judge Perry's courtroom. Judge Perry does not allow any electronic devices, not even for taking notes so I will not be able to use my laptop. More firefighters arrive.  Terri tells me that Becker had already surrendered. He's been in custody since December 16th, 2:45 pm, three days after the last pretrial hearing.

Screenshot of LA Co. Sheriff's website, Inmate Locator

Even more uniformed firefighters arrive. The courtroom gallery will be full. I call my friend Matthew McGough to tell him he better get here soon or he might have trouble getting a seat.  The courtroom is opened and Terri Keith and I take a seat in the front row.  Media cameramen enter and check with the bailiff. The bailiff tells them that Judge Perry has already decided there will be no photography or video taping of the plea and sentencing.  That's interesting. Usually Judge Perry allows video taping of sentencing.

I try to take a count of the room. At the moment, there are approximately 20 firefighters in uniform, and six to eight civilian dressed family members.  The firefighter sitting to my left, (the name plate on his uniform says "Slack") tells me he was Glenn Allen's partner.  He also points out Glen's wife and daughter who are sitting in the front row. I tell Firefighter Slack that I covered the case from about two weeks after the arrest.

Captain Watters, who testified at the preliminary hearing is here. The back and front row are filled with firefighters.

8:17 AM
Attorney Re emerges from the jail holding area and sits at the defense table for a moment.  The AP reporter is here and Matthew arrives. There are other reporters in the courtroom, but there isn't anyone that I immediately recognize.

Judge Perry's clerk, Melody asks if anyone has seen Sean (DDA Carney) yet. LAPD Robbery - Homicide Detective Greg Stearns arrives with two other suited gentlemen. DDA Carney finally enters Dept 104. He stops to greet the family.

Melody addresses DDA Carney. "Sean, let me know when you're ready." He replies, I need a couple minutes."  Carney then goes over to the clerk's desk with some papers and Melody goes back to Judge Perry's chambers. Jane Robison from the DA's office arrives with two others from her staff.

Speaking to the family, DDA Carney outlines who will speak first from the family and who will follow.  I look over at Glenn's wife who appears stoic and composed. I'm over come with sadness. It's just an emotion that overwhelms me and I don't know where it's coming from.  DDA Carney and Mr. Re have a quick chat and then Carney asks to see the judge briefly in chambers.  Re and Carney go back. I struggle to get a hold on my emotions.

A reporter from local KNX radio arrives and inquires about audio taping the proceedings. The bailiff tells him the judge hasn't ruled on that yet. LAPD Robbery - Homicide Detective Dan Meyers arrives and joins Detective Stearns in the well. (Detective Meyers testified for the defense in the Stephanie Lazarus case. I met him at the Ka Pasasouk preliminary hearing.

8:39 AM

DDA Carney and Mr. Re emerge from Judge Perry's chambers. DDA Carney informs the family that only direct family will be allowed to speak. Firefighters who worked with Glen will not be allowed to give an impact statement.  I pass my card to Firefighter Slack and tell him that I will publish any statement in full.

Becker is brought out from the jail area. He's in jail blues.  Re leans in and whispers to him. Judge Perry takes the bench and greets the room. "Good morning, everyone."  He goes on the record in People v. Becker.

Judge Perry starts off by stating there is a request for camera and still photography. Those requests have been denied. "I have a request for audio recording. ... I'm denying. ... I don't feel it's appropriate."  Re goes on the record to object to cameras.

Judge Perry then starts talking about the case and how it started. "This case arose from events ... on February 16th, 2011, ... when a fire broke out in the defendant's home." Glenn Allen, a respected firefighter died when a ceiling collapsed on him and other firefighters.  The court has read various motions and read the preliminary hearing transcripts and had numerous conferences with attorneys.  Judge Perry states he's also read the probation report. "I found several significant errors in that report and want to talk about them at this time." He reads a section of the report on page 3. "It's the court's view, looking at (documentation?) ... that these statements are false."

DDA Carney states, "With respect to the fireplace installed in the top floor, ... there is evidence in the form of photos recovered from the defendant ... the fireplace was installed sometime ... in October 2010."  He goes onto talk about the evidence of the other fireplaces is in the form of text messages that Becker sent.  Judge Perry rules, "I'm striking from the probation report lines 18 through (?) because ... out and out false." I believe Judge Perry goes onto address DDA Carney, that the case was filed under the belief that Mr. Becker had "bootlegged in" the fireplaces after the building had passed inspection.

I believe DDA Carney responds that he believes (or it's the position of the DA's office) that the fireplaces were installed prior to final inspection.  "I don't know one way or the other. .. I know he did conceal many things (from the building inspector?). ... I don't know what unfolded."

Judge Perry talks about the Building & Safety inspector, Mr. Brad Bescos, and the court's opinions about Bescos' testimony and the problems with that testimony. Mr. Re responds about the fireplaces. Judge Perry responds that he doesn't believe Mr. Bescos. "I don't believe him."

Judge Perry then moves onto another part of the probation report that he has a problem with. He reads from the document. "... states circumstances and aggravating (?) ... took advantage of the public trust." He then comments, "I don't understand that, public trust."

DDA Carney responds. "There are numerous instances where the defendant concealed things from Building & Safety," and he outlines some of them.  Judge Perry asks Carney, "Do you think that Mr. Bescos had a problem with the truth?"  Carney responds, "I think there were some problems ... the fire stops. ... There were none. ... The people's view ... He (Bescos) remembered that statement at the prelim where he never mentioned it before."  Judge Perry comments that the people made no effort to file perjury charges against Mr. Bescos.

I believe DDA Carney responds at this point that it's the people's position that Bescos did not lie on the stand.  Judge Perry states he is striking the other statement from the probation report. "I don't think there's anything under the law..." He goes over more in the probation report, and then moves onto the fire stops (aka fire blocking). "One of the difficulties is the lack of fire stops. ... The fire went from the fireplace to a void area, ... up the void area and across the ceiling ... and there were no fire stops in the void area."  Carney states that's absolutely correct. I believe Carney adds that the inspector, Mr. Bescos approved insulation as a fire stop even though he never inspected it. "(The) inspector stated that insulation is approved as a fire stop but it was never inspected to see if it was done."

There is more discussion on what the court characterizes as the failures of the building inspection.  Judge Perry comments on Captain Watters' testimony on the ceiling collapse. "In all his years ... he had never seen a ceiling come down ..." He then moves on to Inspector Thost's testimony, that one of the reasons the ceiling came down was a lack of fire stops.  DDA Carney states he wholeheartedly agrees with that.

Judge Perry states that Mr. Becks is responsible, but also there's partial responsibility of the Building Inspector.

DDA Carney replies, "That's an impossible standard. ... The Building & Safety Code recognizes this." Carney quotes the code that covers this. "Ultimate responsibility lies with the builder. .. In the code..."  I believe DDA Carney explains that the building inspectors are limited in what they can do. They can't verify every single step in the building process on every structure that is built.

Judge Perry states that in having this discussion, "What I'm trying to ... is to make clear to those interested in this matter ... that there are legal issues with this case. ... Significant legal issues."  Judge Perry then goes onto talk about the letters he received and that they will be made a part of the case record. He states that some letters were repetitive but others were thoughtfully written. Everyone calls for the maximum sentence of 4 years.  The DA is offering 2 years.  DDA Carney confirms that is the DA's offer.  Carney states that is the offer prior to (potential) trial. He would expect Becker to serve 1 year.  The DA's offer does not include any conditions on probation. It would be one year in County jail and that would be it. Irrevocable parole would not apply. (I believe at this point Carney may have added that once Becker served his term he would be deported so probation is not an issue.)

Judge Perry states how long he's been a judge, 22 years and that he's tried many felony trials. He mentions he's presided over 268 murder trials. He also mentions that he presided over the John Orr trial, a major arson case. "John Orr, ... tried in this court and convicted of murder. ... I have made an offer to the defendant of probation and 1 year in custody. ... I've done so for the following reasons. ... In the courts view, the fire was clearly unintentional. ... the defendant and girlfriend were sleeping in the house (at the time the fire broke out). ... no prior record. ... (The) court has serious issues of proof ... and loss of life. ... Mr. Re, ... perhaps ... talk about firefighters exception to firefighters (suing?)?"

Firefighters are prohibited from suing for injuries while fighting fires, etc.  DDA Carney adds there is a general rule that civilly, they are not allowed to sue.  Firefighters are not allowed to sue under their duties fighting fires.

I believe it's Judge Perry who adds that Becker went out of his way to ensure that the family was compensated for their loss. Mr. Re states a "substantial settlement" was reached with the family and paid by the insurance company. My notes are not clear. I believe it's Judge Perry who states, "To me, (the settlement) ... reflection of genuine remorse."

There is a real difference between the court and the DA's position.  Becker will be in custody six months verses one year. I believe DDA Carney adds, "I believe the defendant will be removed from the US after serving his term and will not be under the jurisdiction of the court." (Regarding the probation.)  Judge Perry adds, "Under law, since the court has made that offer, the court is bound by it."

DDA Carney, with all due respect to Judge Perry, now puts on the record the DA's position on the lesser sentence offered to Becker by the court. Carney and Judge Perry exchange pleasantries as to their high regard for each other.  I believe Carney states," We have a difference of opinion. ... I know I probably won't persuade the court."

DDA Carney agrees that "... although there are issues of credibility with Mr. Bescos, ... those issues don't mitigate the defendant's own culpability in this case. ... The defendant is responsible for construction in this case."  Judge Perry responds "I accept that."

I believe DDA Carney continues, "He admitted that he built the house. ... He built the fireplace because he said he wanted it done right. ... He was going to do it is way regardless of Building and Safety.  ... The defendant was driven by cost and time.  ... (His) goal was to market it to a TV production and do it on a constricted time scale. ... Building and Safety was an obstacle to that. ... Glen Allen died because the defendant put an outdoor fireplace in his house. ... It was a violation of any reasonable construction standards.  ... He installed a fireplace using wood and drywall. ... He installed a fireplace with gross and inadequate venting or no venting whatsoever. ... He compounded that by no fire stops in the void spaces. ... Just putting fire stops in that one (thing?) ... could have stopped or slowed down this fire. ... The defendant installed four of these fireplaces [in the home]. ... they were all outdoor ... never designed to be installed inside. ... All four showed clear evidence they failed in the same way as the upstairs fireplace. ... It wasn't something that unforeseen. ... All would have caused (a fire?) ... it just happened that the strongest was first. ..."

DDA Carney continues. "The defendant was not someone who was unaware (of building standards).  He had a long experience of building in Spain. ... He was aware of the Building & Safety Code. ... He had a manual with him ... He used the book to argue with Building & Safety as well as contractors who didn't like the way he cut corners. ... He was aware of the manufacturer's instructions. ... He was aware of the manufacturer's warnings. ... Fact is, he just didn't care. ... Because he wanted to save costs and time. ...  All appliances of this type must have a UL rating to be used indoors. ... The manufacturer's not only had instructions, ... the burners had large labels attached in the shipments that had warnings ... (that stated?) ... very important that there are 18" openings to allow ventilation and cooling. ... Without venting, (the fireplace) had a build up of heat, which was (inevitable?) in starting fires. ... It is beyond the pale of any industry standards. ... When Colorado Hearth & Home had (an inkling? these might be installed in a structure?) ... they wrote the defendant [that these were specifically for outdoor installation] ... The defendant wrote back, 'I am aware ... I just don't see the difference. ... It's a pit with a pipe.'  ... The defendant wrote back that he would install venting after inspection ... "

"The disturbing, really truly part of the case ... after firefighter Glenn Allen died in his house ... he's doing reconstruction ... and he sends photos of jell fireplace (to his contractor) ... that are not approved for indoor installation. He writes, 'I ordered this fireplace. I would appreciate if you could ... I want this installed after the final inspection ... so we don't have any further delays.' ... After a firefighter died ... He sends an email to the realtor. ... He's talking about (external?) fire sprinklers ... which he hated the aesthetics ... that's what was important to him ... (aesthetics) ..."  Becker de-installed the sprinklers. "His question to her was ... What do you think I should do? The first option he listed was ... take it out after inspection? ... The only thing that matters to him ... was the aesthetics."

DDA Carney talks about Becker's contract with Tressor, (the TV production company that would have filmed Germany's Next Topmodel, where models would have lived in the defendant's home), and that the contract mentions violations in the building code, such as: 1) the removal of railings from the staircase; 2) the removal of the sprinkler system from the balcony; 3) the removal of the pool alarm.  He failed to list the circumstances of the gross negligence in construction, making fireplaces out of wood and drywall.   Carney then mentions the inadequate size venting in one of the bedrooms, that actually vented back into the bedroom itself. The venting went into the void space and back into the bedroom. This is an example of gross negligence, of a disregard for human life.  "We know he sent an email ... requesting tiles to build another fireplace. ... We know that happened after the inspection. ... As far as he was concerned, Building and Safety was an obstacle to be skirted around. ... I addressed the fire stops. There were no fire stops in the wall."

Judge Perry asks DDA Carney, "(You?) ..don't think that would give you a problem with a jury?" DDA Carney responds, "They would be rightfully more angry at his blatant disregard [for Building & Safety] ..."

I believe it's DDA Carney (but it's possibly Judge Perry) who mentions a New York case, involving a high rise building. I believe he's talking about the Deutsche Bank fire in Manhattan.  Carney continues, "A disconnected pipe fed water to the upper floors." Judge Perry replies, "The jury acquitted in that case."  I believe Judge Perry adds, "... testimony of building inspector at prelim is problematic as Judge Tynan stated." (Judge Tynan presided over the preliminary hearing. Sprocket.)

DDA Carney continues to argue the DA's position. "In California, the Building and Safety inspector can't be responsible for all the defects that go into the building. ... Building and Safety (inspectors?) have very little resources to do what they do. ... They are an administrative agency, not an investigating agency. ... They rely on builders ... wanting to comply with the code. ..."  Carney then tells the court, "I don't believe he lied under oath. ... There are issues with credibility, but I don't believe he lied. ... Mr. Bescos admitted when confronted with photos. ... He admitted that they had to have been there.  ... When Mr. Bescos' supervisor asked him to look at ... [the fire that occurred in the fireplace at the defendant's home] ... his response was, 'What fireplace? There is no fireplace.' "

Judge Perry replies, "But isn't it more of a mitigating factor? ... bootlegged in after inspection?"  DDA Carney agrees with the court there are issues, but he disagrees with where the responsibility lies. "I want to throw the book at him," Carney tells the court, "But I recognize there are issues with the case."  DDA Carney brings up the Conrad Murray involuntary manslaughter trial, but adds that, "Michael Jackson was a willing participant. ... Glenn Allen was not." No settlement, no matter how generous, can make up for the loss of Glenn Allen's life. "I don't think probation sends the right message. ... All I'm saying is, ... this case should have a (?) under the Building and Safety code, because of the blatant disregard [for the code violations]."

Defense attorney Re responds. He states that he's read most of the letters that the court received. He doesn't disregard or belittle in any way [the loss of Glenn Allen's life].  Re mentions the probation report and adds, "One of the things that concerns me is one of the (letters? probation report?) .... don't understand or are aware of (the?) complete circumstances of the case. ... None of the (document?) mentions Building and Safety and Mr. Bescos. ... The story that's out there ... because of the statement of Mr. Bescos. ... We produced to the court and the photos ... that are a part of the record."

Re states that Becker did not try to hid the fireplace from the Building and Safety inspector. That it came out that Mr. Bescos said in a meeting (with the DA's), statements the DDA you heard would have testified to.  Re acknowledges there are family members and other people in the courtroom who are hurt [by Glenn Allen's death].  "One of the great saving graces of our system of justice is putting a brake between (them and the defendant?) ... the court is aware of all of the facts. ... You see Mr. Bescos and how he lied throughout the entire process. ... Mr. Becker has a family he hasn't seen. ... Children he hasn't seen. ... He has accepted responsibility for his part. ... There is restitution that's been made to this family ... and he will be serving time in county jail. ... This is a difficult case, painful case for everyone. ... This man is being punished ... He is a good and decent man."

Judge Perry states he is going to take the plea at this time. If he's not a citizen, he will be deported (after serving his sentence) as a result of the case. Defendant is sentenced to one year and probation. If he violates probation, he could be returned to custody. He will have to live with this for the rest of his life.

The court mentions several court fines. A restitution fine of $280.00. A court security fee of $40.00, and I believe another court fee of $30.00.  Judge Perry advises the defendant of his rights. That the defendant gives up his right to a jury trial. He gives up his right to cross examine witnesses. That he gives up his right to remain silent.  " The charge is involuntary manslaughter, ... unlawful without malice, killing Glenn Allen, a human being."

Gerhard Becker pleads no contest.  Judge Perry states the plea has the came effect as a guilty plea.  Victim impact statements are now requested. Judge Perry requests that the individuals address their comments to him and not the defendant.

Melodie Allen, wife of Glenn Allen is called.
"Thank you Judge Perry.  ... Melodie Allen ... All these are not laws ... just words on a page ... A sentence has passed on me and my family. ... I have to ... I wake up knowing he is dead. ... I met him when he was 5 and I was 10. ... My life is ripped to shreds. ... My daughter has to live her life without her father. ... He was a main stay (in our family?) ... "

As Mrs. Allen speaks, my eyes start to well up.  I have to dab my eyes and try to maintain my composure. DDA Carney has turned his chair around in the well to face her, and watch her read her statement. I could swear his face is becoming emotional, too. (Even while I am transcribing my notes, reading them brings me back to that moment and my eyes well up again. Sprocket.)

Mrs. Allen talks about how her daughter, in the last days of her pregnancy, had to watch her father die then rush to the hospital to give birth to her first child.   "My son-in-law only had three years (with him?) ... but (Glenn?) always addressed him as 'son.' " Both her daughter and son are medical professionals. "They knew there was little hope. ... Their grandson will never feel his hug. ... We know what a loving, supportive man he was ... and why he will be missed.  ... All were shaken to the core. ... He touched all those who knew him ... those who worked / interacted with him at the hospital. ... We had such plans for retirement. ... I know it's cliche, but we had plans of growing old together.  ... I hope he was knocked unconscious, and not aware of what was happening to him."

Deborah Allen, Glenn Allen's sister speaks next. (I apologize. I do not have the confirmed spelling of Ms. Allen's name and I missed hearing the addition of her married last name. Sprocket.)

"Deborah Allen, ... Glenn's sister. ... I wrote a two page letter." Her voice starts to break. Judge Perry gently responds, "I know. I read it."

"Melodie said it all beautifully as to how I feel. ... I was the middle ... there were three of us. ... We were close as any brother and sister could be. ... He would tell me anything and I could tell him ... anything. ... I miss his goofy smile. ... the hardest thing (I've?) ever had to do ..."

She starts to cry.  DDA Carney is watching her give her impact statement.

"I knew he was gone when I drove from San (Diego? Francisco?) that he was gone."  She talks about her family and the shock of Glenn's death.  "Our mother can't say his name anymore.  ... The firefighters that were there that day, ... they will have to live with the fact that their comrade died. ... There were (other?) firefighters that were also injured. ... I want him to serve the full (term?) ... No probation."

There are no other impact statements.

Judge Perry states that the defendant has no right to address the court but if he wishes to address the court, I would allow it.  Mr. Re states there is no statement from Mr. Becker. "I am of the belief this is the appropriate sentence for this matter. ... No sentence can replace the life of Glenn Allen. ... Defendant is placed on felony probation for three years. ... (including today there are?) 68 days good time credits. ..."

Judge Perry continues with the sentencing and fees but I don't note those. Mr. Re states he's filed a motion to return Mr. Becker's property. There is no objection from the people.

As people start to file out of the courtroom, family, friends and their supporters hug.  The defendant will serve six months on the 1 year jail term, (because he's in county and it's good time credit earning accounting.  Becker has about four more months to serve, and then he will most likely be deported.
And that's it.

Notes post hearing
I'm told that during the proceeding, the KNX reporter nodded out at times and appeared to be snoring.  Matthew and I decided to attend the press conference on the 12th floor where DDA Carney will address the media about the case and Judge Perry's ruling.

 DDA Sean Carney, Arson Division addressing the media 1/3/14.

I have an audio recording of the presser in two parts and lots of photos.  I'm having difficulty getting the audio uploaded to YouTube.  As soon as I resolve that, I will post an update with links.  The media was promised a copy of Mrs. Allen's full statement via (I believe) email, however, I haven't received that yet.

I know that two firefighters wanted to give impact statements, but Judge Perry would only allow immediate family to give impact statements.  If there is anyone of Glenn Allen's friends or family that would like their impact statement in the press, I'm happy to publish that statement in full. Contact me via email at: sprocket.trials AT gmail.com.

Close up of Firefighter Glenn Allen's memorial photo,
worn by a fellow firefighter at Becker's sentencing.

LA Observed Article - Architect Pleads Out in Firefighter Death - gets one year

LA Times - German Architect gets 1 year sentence in death of L.A. firefighter

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Gerhard Becker Preliminary Hearing, Part VII

 Gerhard Becker, left, at a previous court hearing
 with his first counsel, Chad Lewin

This is the last part of a seven part series of the Gerhard Becker Preliminary Hearing. Sprocket

Continued from Prelim Part VI.....

November 28th, 2012
10:00 AM
After attending a hearing in the Michael Gargiulo case, I head down to the 3rd floor to Dept. 42, Judge Tynan's courtroom. When I enter, the courtroom is full. There are over 25 people, mostly men, sitting in the gallery.  Judge Tynan handles alternative sentencing programs, also known as "drug court" and the people in the gallery are just some of the cases he handles on a daily basis.

10:14 AM
Judge Tynan comes out from his chambers. He's wearing a dark blue shirt, burgundy tie with a stud pin. He puts on his robe, takes the bench then calls the first case.  It's a woman. Judge Tynan asks her how she's doing. She replies, "I'm okay, I think."  Judge Tynan tells her, "I don't think so. You're not taking your meds." Judge Tynan asks her counsel if he has any problem with speaking to his client in the vestibule. Both reply, "No, your honor." Judge Tynan takes the defendant back to his chambers to speak to her. After the private conversation is over, Judge Tynan retakes the bench and states for the record, "I had a talk with Ms. (the defendant) in full view of my bailiff and nothing untoward happened. ... She's not taking her meds. ... Have her back in one week."

I start to have a coughing fit and quickly exit the courtroom. I don't want to get a look from the judge that I'm disturbing the court proceedings. While I try to gain control of my lungs, I make a note of the people in the hallway. It's a sea of uniformed officers, under cover-looking officers and detectives mixed in with the general public. This is quite different that what I usually see on the 9th floor.  At the other end of the hallway, I notice Becker's defense attorney, Donald Re.  Feeling better, I head back inside Dept. 42.

10: 40 AM
A new defendant is before Judge Tynan and he is addressing him. "Do you play the violin? ... Your buddy plays the violin.  ... You're doing pretty good Mr. G____, But I think you're one of the guys playin' around. ... [I'm going to] ... keep you on second track and see you back in January."  The next defendant is up and Judge Tynan is told that he's doing great.  When the defendant is ordered back, about half the gallery gives him applause.

Another defendant who needs a Spanish interpreter.  His defense attorney tells Judge Tynan that his client is also doing well.  He will continue onto a third phase of recovery.  He's ordered back January 9th, and again there is applause in the gallery.

The next defendant is a woman.  I saw her crying earlier in the gallery.  Judge Tynan is told she suffered the loss of her husband four months ago. It's been 14 years since she last used cocaine. The death of her husband drove her back. She lives with her son and doesn't have a job. Judge Tynan rules she's allowed back into the program.  The defendant is very emotional and upset about her arrest.  I believe Judge Tynan addresses her, speaking encouragingly. "You see all these people in court. They were in the same situation you are. ... Just work the program and you'll do fine."

There are many defendants whose cases are to be heard.  Each and every time, Judge Tynan gives compassionate advice for these individuals who are struggling with alcohol and drug addiction. "If you're willing to work with us, we're willing to work with you," Judge Tynan tells one defendant. He adds a bit of advice, "They're going to test you when you get there, so don't use."

A reporter from the Associated Press enters the courtroom.

The next defendant was on the US Cole, and saw his buddies get killed. It messed him up. The defendant is originally from Chicago. When he first came out to California, he worked in a medical marijuana dispensary. I believe Judge Tynan tells him he shouldn't be "proud" of that. Judge Tynan asks the defendant's rank when he went in the Navy. "E4," he replies. Judge Tynan responds, "Well, I was only an E3."

11:00 AM
DDA Frances Young enters. She's wearing a deep purple jacket with her long black skirt.  The last defendant is being released from the Impact program.  I believe he's ordered back on December 4th for a preliminary hearing. Judge Tynan's court reporter lets out a loud sneeze.  Public Defender Mark DeWitt jokingly comments, "That's a sneeze for the records." Judge Tynan joins in on the humor, "For the Guinness Records" he adds. DDA Carney arrives. Becker, who was in the courtroom for a short time earlier, returns.

I have a quote in my notes here, that I remember Judge Tynan addressing a defendant, but I'm not sure if it's regarding a new defendant who just entered or an earlier case. "I want you to write one thousand words about what you did, why you did it and how you're not going to do it again.  My bailiff will give you some stamped papers ... with some questions on it."  This is one of the ways Judge Tynan tries to get the defendants before him to look be introspective about their own behavior.

11:17 AM
I think we're about to go on the record with Becker. There's a discussion in the well between the court reporter and counsel.  I believe the court reporter asks, "What's your favorite movie and why."  There is another question that I believe she asks, "Where do you get your news and if the Internet, which sites."  The AP reporter is asking Carney some questions.  DDA Francis Young replies her movie is Top Gun, and Donald Re responds, The Godfather.  Young tells the group she was a "quasi navy brat."

11:27 AM
Detective Greg Stearns is called to the stand.  He brings a very large three ring binder with him.  Stearns gives his background. He was the lead investigating officer for this case.  He responded to the location on Viewsite Drive. He conducted a search of the residence and found a business card that included an email address belonging to the defendant. Detective Stearns found a set of architectural plans on top of a fire place (in one of the lower levels).

People's exhibit #35, the structure's architectural plans. Stearns also found the multicolored, code check book for California.

SC: Is that the same booklet identified as exhibit 51, that I showed to Mr. Bescos?
GS: Yes, it is.
SC: Did you also find a contract with Tressor Entertainment, US, LLC?
GS: Yes.
SC: Where was that found?

Detective Stearns checks his report to refresh his memory.

GS: I believe it was in the office area.
SC: Exhibit #36, ... a contract. ... Appears to be a photo of the first page of the contract?
GS: Yes.
SC: Did you also seize a computer at some point?
GS: Not from the house.

A computer was seized from Mr. Becker at some point after the interview with the arson investigator, and also a (cell) phone. Detective Stearns believes something else was seized from a residence where the defendant was staying with a friend. Both items were submitted to Detective Hunter for review.

SC: The location agreement, had that contract been initialed on each page and signed?
GS: Yes.

The contract was between Tressor Entertainment and Gerhard Becker.

SC: Did the contract state ... that there was a move-in date of February 24th, 2011?
GS: Yes.
SC:And the date of the fire was February 16th?

The contract was for filming Germany's Next Top Model.  Gerhard Becker was to be paid $100,000.00 for filming at the Viewsite residence.  Detective Stearns acquired several search warrants to obtain copies of Becker's emails.

People's exhibit #37, a copy of the authentication document for records received from Microsoft. The search was for the email address just presented.

SC: Did you receive...
DRe: Objection! There is no foundation that these were received by ... written to Mr. Becker.

I miss the ruling.  Detective Stearns testifies that he verified the exchange of emails from Becker's email account and a couple of different employees of Colorado Hearth & Home, regarding the ordering of several fire pits.  The text of the few emails are read in court.

From Colorado Hearth & Home to the defendant:
Okay, are you aware that the manufacturers specifications ... they are only for outdoors. ... want to be sure before you buy these.
This was in regards to burner troughs described in prior emails. Mr. Re object that there is no foundation. I believe the ruling is it's admitted for the purposes of the preliminary hearing only. There are questions about whether or not Becker informed Tressor Entertainment, that they were aware of the modifications to the house (the missing guard rail and the missing fire sprinklers).  Mr. Re objects but DDA Carney states the information is relevant to Becker's state of mind.  Carney reads from an email Becker sent Tressor Entertainment about the building code violations and wanted to ensure Tressor would hold Becker harmless if anyone gets hurt. Judge Tynan over rules the objection.

A new set of emails are reviewed between Becker and his realtor. Re objects because hey are well after the incident. DDA Carney states these also go to Becker's state of mind. The email is after the fire. It's after he was told to install outdoor sprinklers. Becker rips them out. After the fire, he puts them back in for code check then, complaining to the realtor that he doesn't like how they look, he wants to take them out again.  The objection is over ruled.

The listing agent for Becker's house is Marci Hartley.  DDA Carney goes over Becker's communication questions to Ms. Hartley about removing the sprinklers before the sale.  The three options Becker gives in the email are presented.  1. De-install again after the final. 2. Leave and paint. 3. Cover with drywall so that heads are the only thing seen.

People's exhibit #39, it's a text of the email just discussed without the header and raw data information.  People's exhibit #40, another email from the defendant to a Mr. Jeff McQueen. It's a chain of emails.  The emails discuss a Gel Fireplace.  A Gel fireplace is a ventless fireplace that uses ethanol as fuel. People's exhibit #53, an email exchange between Becker and a Walter Hanes (sp?).

In the email, Becker wants to order this fireplace. "I want this installed after the inspection so that we don't have any further delay by the inspector."

A text message is introduced for the purpose of the preliminary hearing only.  That Detective Hunter was called, sworn and testified that he obtained this text message that Detecitve Stearns submitted to him. Re will only stipulate that the detective (Hunter?) pulled this off Becker's cell phone.

Carney asks Stearns if he is familiar with text messaging. The text message was sent 1/31/2011, a couple of weeks before the fire.
Hi Jose, Did you (use/take) already all the tiles or can I have four back? I forgot to make one fireplace.
 Sent to a phone number belonging to Jose Briseno. Briseno was a general contractor who worked for the defendant on site. A photo of the bathroom fireplace is up on the screen.

SC: Did you talk to Mr. Briseno about what tiles?
GS: Yes. ... They were 12" x 12" tiles.
SC: They were ones affixed to the back of the fireplace?
GS: Yes.

The lunch break is called. Judge Tynan orders the parties back by 1:45 PM.

1:30 PM
I forgot to mention that a reporter named Andrew from the LA Times was here for part of the morning.  Andrew is back for the afternoon session. Andrew's colleague, Andrew Blankstein sent him over to cover the prelim. There's some laughter and conversation between the court and the parties in the well.

1:48 PM
The crime reporter from the AP arrives.  Detective Stearns retakes the stand.

People's exhibit #38, a text message recovered from Becker's phone.

SC: You interviewed Mr. Briseno?
GS: Yes.
SC: Was he one of the contractors?
GS: Yes.
SC: Did you ask Mr. Briseno if he received a text message?
GS: Yes, I did.
SC: Did you ask him when he received it? ... text message?
GS: Yes. ... Two weeks before. ... There was tile that was excess. He delivered it back to Mr. Becker.
SC: Did you have a conversation with Mr. Bescos regarding gel fireplaces?
GS:: Actually, that conversation was before that.
SC: When was that?
GS: Three to four months ago.
SC: Did you ask Mr. Bescos whether a gel fireplace could be installed in California?
GS: He said that it's not allowed because it's not a listed appliance.

People's exhibit 36A, the full contract between Tressor Ent. and Gerhard Becker. Stearns verifies that it's an accurate copy of the contract that was retrieved from Mr. Becker's house.

SC: Did you speak with Greg Steck of Hearth Products Construction Company?
GS: Yes.
SC: Did you meet with him?
GS: Yes.
SC: In Ohio?
GS: Yes.
SC: Was that at the company?
GS: Yes, at the company.

People's exhibit #54, a photo of a packaged product from Hearth Products.

SC: Did you discuss with Mr. Steck how a product is shipped?
GS: [Yes.] ... and he produced one and I took a photo.

Stearns discusses the photo of the packaged product. Stearns explains that the photo shows the standard way their product is shipped from their company. People's exhibit 55A and 55B. They're photos of the living room area of the house.  The defense will stipulate that the photos were found by Detective Hunter on (Becker's) iPhone for the purpose of the prelim only. A date of 1/21/2011 is mentioned but I'm not sure what it references.  The photos depict the fire trough enclosure and where the trough was cut out.  The meta data has a date of 9/23/2010.  The enclosure for the trough is built but the trough is not there.  Another photo is of a bathroom.   Counsel stipulate that Detective Hunter extracted the photo from the iMac Computer.  The photo is of a bathroom fireplace near a tub that's located on the 2nd floor.  The photo depicts that there is no tile.  The photo is dated 10 days before the text message to the contractor.

Another email is discussed that was retrieved via the search warrants for Becker's email account. There are photos attached to the email.   These are People's exhibits 53 and 52.  One photo is of a new fireplace.  The photos were sent to Mr. Becker.

SC: In your conversations with Greg Steck, did you ask if whether or not the company had ever been sued over product liability?
GS:Yes.
DRe: Objection!

I believe DDA Carney argues that counsel brought up this issue in cross. Judge Tynan will allow for limited (effect?) on credibility.

GS: He said they had not.
SC: Did he have any (diagrams?) with gas appliances similarly installed in this case?
GS: Yes, he did.

Carney presents a digital exhibit in three dimensions.  It's a computer aided diagram.  Mr. Re objects. He's not seen it.  Carney explains he only brought it in for the court, because the court had previously inquired about a diagram.

SC: Did you interview the person who worked at the Viewsite house for (electrical?)?
GS: Yes.
SC: Who was that?
GS: Amir Schinter (sp?)
DRe: Objection! It's irrelevant what Mr. Schinter thinks.
JT: (Objection over ruled?)

My next set of notes appear to be argument by DDA Carney. I don't believe they are testimony.

Mr. Schinter was the electrical contractor. 1. He told detectives he had a (difficult?) relationship with Becker.  Becker wanted to do things in violation of the Building Code so Mr. Schinter quit.  2. At one point, he observed what would be a fireplace enclosure and Becker told him "No."  3. This supports Besco's statement he asked about Becker about a fireplace and Becker said no.

Mr. Re responds, "I hate to say (it's) ... really getting far afield. .... I think it's too far afield."

My notes are not clear who is speaking, if it's DDA Carney or Detective Stearns explaining.

Mr. Schinter first met Becker in 2010. (He was referred?) based on a neighbor and engaged in May 2010 to work on the project.  Becker was asking Schinter about the speed of the project. The first floor wiring. The defendant wanted some things taken out and his own wiring put in.   Bescos testified the original wiring was code.  The monster wire that Becker wanted installed, although bigger, didn't meet code.  Becker took out the original wiring Mr. Schinter did. When Schinter returned to the work site and saw the electrical work had been changed, it was troubling. He stopped working for Becker.  Schinter told Detective Stearns about a conversation he had with Becker about the fireplace and the structure used as a fireplace and Becker denied it.  The article in the paper about the fire is what led the electrical contractor (to contact LE?).

Direct is finished and cross examination begins.

DRe: Mr. Schinter, did he tell you he quit?
GS: Yes.
DRe: When did he (start?)?
GS: He started in May 2010. ... would have to look at (his) statement to verify. I don't have independent memory of when he quit.

Detective Stearns looks through his paperwork.

GS: He indicated he left the job in November 2010.
DRe: Did you go into depth in ...
GS: He was a licensed electrical contractor. ... He found people that were doing work, electrical work [on the property?], as I understand it and he wasn't going to be responsible for it.
DRe: He stopped doing work at the house and called that quitting?
GS: Yes.

People's exhibit 55A, a photo of inside the house.  It's a long range photo of a cut-out on the upper floor.  People's exhibit 55B shows a cut out in the middle. The date of the photos is pinned to 9/23/10.  The photo shows the flat portion of the fireplace area.  A small portion, a middle of the space where the metal trough would go.

DRe: In September, that cut out area was already there?
GS: Yes.

There is some more back and forth about this photo and what the detective could testify to regarding what the photo shows.

DRe: The photo was taken five to six weeks before the final?
GS: A couple of months.

Detective Stearns states that is appears something that, when they executed the search warrant there was a space left that is similar to the space in the photo.

DRe: Who was Mr. Brisneo ?
GS: Contractor on the project.

He worked on some closets.

DRe: And he told you at some time, he saw what he thought was a fireplace on the upper floor? ... When was that?

Detective Stearns looks to that individuals' statement.

2:25 PM
Judge Tynan calls the afternoon break.  It passes quickly and we're back on the record.  The parties stipulate that Mr. Brisneo said he had worked on some closets from sometime between early to late September 2010.  Another photo is shown to Detective Stearns. He believes it is the bottom floor. There are tiles in the alcove of the fireplace near the tub. Mr. Brisneo said they were similar to tiles he had delivered to Mr. Becker.  There are questions about the construction of the fireplace and how it had to be constructed.

DRe: You're not saying that because the tile was installed on that date, that the trough assembly was installed on that date?
GS: No.
DRe: Did you ever see a gel fireplace installed in this place, ever?
GS: No.
SC: Objection! Foundation!
JT: Well, Mr. Re did object earlier.

I think Mr. Re has a bit of surprise in his voice when he denies making an objection. There's a bit of laughter among counsel.

DRe: Are you aware of a gel fireplace ever being installed in this residence?
GS: No.

Mr. Re asks Detective Stearns what he knew Mr. Bescos said about "Wait until the final and then you can remove it? Stearns replies, "No."  There are questions about the emails to the real estate agent and that they might have been questions Becker had about what to do was best.

DRe: Do you know if the sprinkler system was removed?
GS: No, I do not.
DRe: [The contract with Tressor, people's #36A] Do you know the date that contract was written?
GS: The date of execution was 2/11/2011, six days before the fire.
DRe: Did you come across emails from Germany's Next Top Model?
GS: Yes.

Detective Stearns doesn't have an independent memory of the dates of the emails.  I believe Re asks Stearns if he recalls Mr. Bescos' testimony.  I believe Detective Stearns reviews the documents.

DRe: Does that refresh your memory about what you put in your affidavit?  ... The fireplace had been covered over?
GS: That was my [understanding].

Cross is finished and there's no redirect.  DDA Carney tells the court they do have some stipulations that they all agree to.  DDA Young tells the court about testimony they would have heard from the medical examiner. Dr. Ortiz performed the autopsy on 2/19 at 11:30, LA Co Coroner case number 2011-01252, (I don't think I have that number correct. Sprocket.)  Dr. Ortiz's conclusion, he would opine that the cause of death was in layman's terms, the result of trapped debris of a roof, that prevented normal ambulatory ... constriction of lungs ... presented by the presence of petechiae.

Re states this is for the purpose of the prelim only. The court takes the stipulation. Re also has stipulations regarding what Mr. Bescos did or told Mr. Becker. I believe the first stipulation is that Mr. Bescos did not inform Mr. Becker that the insulation was an approved fire block. [Mr. Bescos] never checked the second and third levels. He never checked where the wall meets the attic. Mr. Bescos stated I don't care about insulation. I care about electrical and (framing?). Most (interestingly?) Mr. Bescos said, that fireplace could have been there in September.  Mr. Bescos used the example of pool alarms as to how to get around the codes.  Re adds Mr. Bescos' comment that residences are not (as important?). It's not a Macey's.

DDA Carney states they will stipulate for the purpose of the preliminary hearing only. DDA Carney offers to admit the exhibits by reference only. Re moves to object to all exhibits he's objected to previously. Re then mentions the defense exhibits.
 Defense Arguments
The defense goes first. Re states that Mr. Becker and (Fiana?) were sleeping in the home at the time the fire broke out. It shows a level of non-knowledge.  People v. Penny.

Re goes through a list of items. The warnings, the combustible fire stops, the wonder board. Re states that Fire Investigator Thost didn't seem to know that insulation couldn't be used as a fire stop. Re states that the people have talked about the reason for the fire was lack of venting, but he still doesn't see how that caused the fire to be drawn down.  Re goes over the various issues with Mr. Besco's testimony. The claim that Mr. Bescos said Mr. Becker told him there would be no fireplace.

The fire stops. No mention in his report about his discussion with Mr. Becker about fire insulation and fire stops.  Mr. Bescos mentions it 19 months after the fire. He first told the DA (when?) he was interviewed (about the?) fire stops.  Go to his computer notes, they don't mention fire blocks. His hand notes in September mention fire stops.  He admits that relates to the water heater and added later. I suggest to the court that he added that note after the fire.  The question is, did he inspect fire stops? "He came here and said he did inspect, yet, told the DA he didn't. ... He didn't check to see what type of insulation was okay. ... So he either lied to the DA or he lied her on the stand." It gives a glimpse into his motive. I suggest he removed from the records any notes about fire blocks.

We know that he is willing to blame Mr. Becker for this because he said he inspected fire blocks. I said before, in (the?) initial report he says shocked he didn't know there were any fireplaces.  The "covered over" issue in regards to fireplaces.  Re argues that Bescos had a self-interest for dereliction of duty for how he testified on the stand. We know this is a man who is wiling to alter his records because he added (the note about?) the water heater. I suggest he knew there would be a fireplace. I suspect that he didn't know that Mr. Becker took so many photos.  Re goes over the photos. Mr. Bescos says that he never saw it. He tells the DA that could have been there in September .... possibly talked about a fireplace in September. In here (on the stand), he tells us that he "means it was covered up at that time."  He tells the DA that it was covered up. Then he comes in here again and says that he saw pebbles and tile, two years later is the first time (we hear about it). Why didn't he tell the fire inspector?

Re continues. "He said oh, they're not for a fireplace. Those are for display." Re argues, "That's ridiculous ... that,  ... no one would display anything 18" off the ground.  Re continues to argue to show what he believe the photos show. That the gas line was there, and Bescos identified it as a gas line.  Re proposes that Mr. Bescos was lying.  Re then presents another case that was ruled entrapment by estoppel, to support his argument that this case is the same issue. Re continues to argue for his client but I stop to rest my note taking. Re brings up the Building Code, and the fact that the city can't be sued ... it's because of civil suits. It has nothing to do with Mr. Becker and his house that they signed off on.

3:25 PM
There is a short break. I have in my notes some information about Judge Tynan's court. If I'm remembering correctly, those of us in the jury box ask the court or his staff a few questions.

Judge Tynan used to preside over Dept. 113 before moved to Dept. 42.  The chair that is between the bailiff's desk and the door to the jail holding area is the chair that Richard Ramirez sat in during his 14 month trial. The dolls and stuffed animals that are piled up in the witness box are gifts people dropped off. They help to relax people; make them feel better.

I believe I had mentioned previously that I had noticed high up on a wall ledge over the clerk's desk, an old toy that I couldn't identify. It's finally identified. It's an Inspector Gadget doll. He was originally in Judge Tynan's old courtroom. Someone mailed that to Judge Tynan as a Christmas gift.  Judge Tynan tells the room, "I have a rather fun bunch of staff I work with." Judge Tynan mentions the Ramirez case he presided over and that he sentenced Ramirez in 1989.  The DDA who prosecuted the case, Phil Halpin is also mentioned. DDA Carney mentions that his father was a deputy DA. "When I was a boy I remember him talking about Phil Halpin. ... Some of Dad's office mates talked about him."  There's more discussion about the case.  The name of the saloon, Little Joe's, that everyone went to after court ended for the day.

Prosecution Arguments
DDA Carney uses a PowerPoint program to help present his arguments. [Lets] "Bring this case back to what it's all about. Mr. Bescos is not on trial. .. What let to the fire is this defendant's construction and this ludicrous fireplace made of wood. ... That is sufficient because no reasonable person would build a fireplace out of wood." (A fire) would eventually have happened. "My three year old knows the difference between indoor and outdoor yet he put them in there anyway. ... And that's what caused the fire. .. What caused the fire was the defendant's arrogance, because he thought he knew better. ... Because he was in charge in Europe. ... It was made out of combustible materials.  ... The burner was put in wood.  ... Even if there was approved fire block it wouldn't eliminate the defendant for his liability."

Because of the ceiling collapse, because of the (defendant's?) conduct, the fire breaks is just an aside. When he built, put in these fireplaces, there were no fire breaks. The expert, he described what he saw as free flow of fire. "We know who built that wall; the defendant did. He said so in his interview with fire inspectors," Carney states. "We know that he was warned by the vendor who supplied the device."

He would break out his code book. He held himself out to be an expert. He would argue the code. Even after a firefighter dies in his house, he tells the contractor ... that's rebuilding his house ... sends an email that he want to put in a gel fireplace, (which is) not an approved appliance, after the final inspection.  "Not only was he the one building a fireplace that killed Glenn Allen, but he was ready to do it again," Carney argues.

Carney goes over the 911 call. He mentions the burned out wooden supports in the false ceiling that collapsed. Carney mentions the testimony of Captain Watters, and the hole venting. We can see in that photo, flames venting out of the attic space. "There was nothing that retarded the flow of that fire into the ceiling," says Carney.  "The aftermath. Glenn Allen was covered in very heavy construction materials. ... He was compressed into a clam shell (position). He couldn't breathe and he dies. ... any reasonable person would have known because of the warnings on the product."

Glenn Allen died because the defendant used an outdoor fireplace inside. The interior of the fireplace was made of combustible materials, two-by-four framing next to the burners. There was no venting 18" under the trough. The fire spread rapidly due to the failure to install any fire stops.

Carney then moves onto Becker's interview. He admits to installing the fire appliance and building the enclosure. Carney quotes the defendant in the interview. "I designed it. I built it. ... I did the drywall work around the fireplace because I wanted it done right. ... I ordered the fireplace myself."

The fire burned the available combustibles. The left control box, the fire burned around the box itself. DDA Carney presents a photo. When the defendant ordered the fireplace, the email from the distributor said, "You are aware that the manufacturer's specifications...."  The defendant replied, "I'm aware, I just don't see the difference. It is a pit with a pipe. I am aware that I have to cover the area with fire resistant (materials)."  Warning instructions about the fire pit were included with the appliance.  Carney tells the court, "Becker followed none of them. ... Mr. Becker engaged with a pattern of deception in this case. ... Mr. Becker had contempt for Building and Safety. ... In August 2010, Mr. Becker told Building and Safety he did not plan to install any fireplace in the home."  The original plans had one.

Carney then moves onto Dale Feb's testimony.  "Because as Dale Feb said, because the building code says that even though the inspector approved (construction?) it doesn't relieve the builder of the responsibility."  You don't build a fireplace out of wood. The defendant absolutely knew he was violating safety standards.  Carney gives an example of police not catching criminals, bank robbers.  Carney adds, "Building and Safety is not to ensure everything complies with the code, it's to try to ensure that it does." Dale Feb said, "What we rely on is like anything else in our society is the good faith that the builder (would build to standards)."

Carney mentions again that Becker told Bescos there would be no fireplace. He mentions the plan of deception emails Becker wrote that say, "after inspection." He tells the electrician to install wiring that's not to code. Carney says, "The arrogance of listing Building & Safety violations in a contract is amazing to me."  Carney reads from the contract. "The Building and Safety violations in the house, ... So for Mr. Re to say that Mr. Becker relied on Building & Safety is entirely ludicrous."

Mr. Becker didn't mention in the contract the fireplaces were out of code. The carbon monoxide went back into the lower bedroom. The same bedroom that if not for the upstairs fire would have occurred in where those models would have lived.  Carney mentions another email Becker sent after a firefighter died in his house. Carney argues that for the defense to say that Mr. Becker relied on Brad Bescos, totally disregards the emails to the real estate agent, about removing fire suppressant sprinklers on the lower floors.

Carney accuses Becker of gross negligence.  He cites speed and cost.  The appropriate fireplace (that was eventually installed) cost at least $30,000.00.  Carney argues the Becker's building was total gross negligence.  "Any reasonable person, having seen all the red flags, with his background, knowledge, ... would certainly have known."  Carney states the fireplace need not be the sole cause of Glenn Allen's death. If (independent?) cause brings death ... still causation if (independent?) cause foreseeable, or the type of injury caused was death.

Defense counter argument
Main issue is the fireplace downstairs. The question of the insulation, fire breaks, again goes back to Mr. Bescos. Mr. Re addresses the warnings on the products.  "Those warnings are put on products by the company to avoid product liability." There's no evidence Mr. Becker put in a gel fireplace. "There is only a crime here if the acts were done in a particular way."  Re argues the intention of the code regulations, ... and what it means.  "The people are going into his mental stand and what his [Becker] mental state is. ... I f the court should find construction improper, is the defendant responsible in the face of a government authority that passes it?  And if the court says it can't I don't know where that leaves it."  Re mentions the mental state again.

Judge Tynan
The arguments are over and the court gives it's ruling. "Mr. Bescos is a problematic witness for the prosecution."  Mr. Re asks the court, "Do you want Mr. Becker to stand?" Judge Tynan replies, "I don't see why. We're all sitting here."

"I want to compliment all the attorneys. It's been a genuine pleasure to be here." Judge Tynan is concerned by the structure, the box the fire pit was put into, is on 18" high and the flame goes 16" high and the drywall above it." I'm convinced that Mr. Becker, as charming a fellow as he is, was deceptive in the building construction. ... I think he acted recklessly."  Judge Tynan is terribly sorry that Mr. Allen died. Judge Tynan states that he thinks Mr. Becker should be (committed over?) for trial and there is sufficient evidence that Mr. Becker is guilty.

The 2 million bond is discussed. Judge Tynan states that the date of arraignment will be December 16th in Dept. 116. Mr. Becker is still out on bail and his bail will stand. The court orders a pre-plea report.

The prosecution needs a moment to check with their supervisor to determine if they are going to file/claim 170.6 against having the case transferred to Dept. 116. It's just a matter of seeing if Bill Hodgeman is within arm's reach.  While this issue gets resolved (the case does get transferred to Dept. 116), Judge Tynan and his court reporter share with the room how she came to be assigned to Judge Tynan.

And that's it for the preliminary hearing.

Gerhard Becker Quick Links