Showing posts with label Rebecca Grossman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rebecca Grossman. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Murder Trial Starts for Socialite Rebecca Grossman

 Socialite Rebecca Grossman's life changed forever on the evening of September 29, 2020. Prosecutors allege Grossman's Mercedes, driving at a high rate of speed, struck and killed two young boys who were in a crosswalk on Triunfo Canyon Road in Westlake Village, Ca. It was a visual horror for the Isklander family. Jacob, 8, and Mark, 11, Isklander were in the crosswalk with their mother, Nancy when she witnessed her children struck by the speeding vehicle. One child died at the scene; the other died at the hospital.

Grossman is charged with two counts of second degree murder, two counts of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence and one count of hit-and-run driving resulting in death. From shortly after her arrest, Grossman posted the 2M bond and was released from custody.

There are several excellent reports on this case in The Acorn and the Los Angeles Times. Some are listed below. Grossman's booking photo has not been released. You can see photos of Grossman at the various links.

On the bench is Superior Court Judge Joseph Brandolino. Deputy DA's Jamie Castro and Ryan Gould are prosecuting. Goldman's defense is led by attorney Tony Buzbee.

I had started following the news reports on this case over a year ago. I had hoped to attend the trial at the Van Nuys Courthouse, located close to where I live. It would have been an easy drive. This is the very same building where I attended my first trial, the Robert Blake murder trial, which started in December, 2004. Back then, I wrote about attending the case on Internet message boards. The Grossman case is interesting because I can see both sides having horrific consequences of this tragic event. The Isklander family lost their two oldest children right before their eyes. Rebecca Grossman, co-director of The Grossman Burn Foundation with her husband, Dr. Peter Grossman is also a mother. She is facing decades in jail away from her children, family and the life she knew. But unfortunately, I can't attend.

There are times when life changes your plans. As most of you know by now, I've been on a cancer journey since being diagnosed February 2, 2021 with Stage IV Urothelial Carcinoma, also known as "Bladder Cancer." There is no cure. In October '23, my care was transferred to a Bladder Cancer specialist at USC. I've been on a new drug since then with a rare side effect of over-histamine production. There isn't a drug that I've tried that dries up my overactive sinuses completely. This in turn, means I have post-nasal drip and a chronic cough. There's no way a judge would allow me to sit in a courtroom in the gallery with a chronic cough. I've had too much experience covering high-profile trials to know I'd be told to leave.
 
I'll be following this case in the LA Times.

FYI Note: Trials & Tribulations has always been, based on my long-time interest in why people commit murder and a deep love of the law. I would sit in a courtroom and listen to motion arguments or testimony all day if I could. Attending high-profile murder trials has always been a free service of giving back to the community. There is no advertising and there are no membership fees to read T&T content. T&T has received small donations over the years from our readers to cover my travel costs to court and purchase court documents. See my ABOUT page.

Sprocket Note: I've been working on an update post on my cancer journey since last September. Hopefully, I'll get everyone up-to-date soon. Here's a short recap. The good news is, I'm here, on the planet. I'm still on two feet, I can still take care of myself, drive, grocery shop, get to USC, etc., all on my own. However, I have lots of fatigue. I don't have the energy I used to have. I have to rest a lot. The neuropathy that developed in my hands (around late July from the chemo drugs) has made my sewing projects take much longer to complete.

Media Articles
01-16 2024 LA Times
11-21-2022 Los Angeles Magazine - Interview with Rebecca Grossman



Tuesday, July 4, 2023

Going to Court 6/26/23 Monica Sementilli & Robert Louis Baker Pretrial Hearing 16

 June 26, 2023

 Fabio Sementilli 

Source: HairTalk.com

It has been three-and-a-half years since I've stepped inside a courtroom. The original reason I stepped away from covering high-profile murder trials was economical. I was newly divorced and I had to find a way to support myself after being a semi-retired housewife for 17 years.

For quite some time now, I've been wanting to get back inside a courtroom, but my cancer treatments have kept me close to home. I've missed listening to lawyers argue nuanced points of law, hearing witnesses testify, and observing the jury as well as who shows up to sit in the courtroom gallery. I do love the law. Everything about it is interesting to me. Even though I could not attend, I kept track of the next pretrial and post trial hearings in two cases I covered extensively, the Baker/Sementilli case and Michael Gargiulo until he was sentenced.

Lately, I've been reading news reports and keeping up with a case that will be tried in a courthouse closer to where I live, the Van Nuys West Courthouse. This is the same courthouse where I attended much of the Robert Blake murder trial, long before I started T&T. The new case is the murder trial of Rebecca Grossman, a tragedy for all parties involved. Grossman is charged with two counts of second degree murder in the deaths of two children, Mark (11) and Jacob (8) Iskander. (I will say, that the only other child murder case I covered was one of the most emotionally draining cases I've ever experienced.

Grossman is alleged to have hit the Iskander boys with her Mercedes in a Westlake Village crosswalk and fleeing the scene. (From news reporting on the preliminary hearing, it is my understanding that Grossman's air-bag deployed and the Mercedes shut down because of that deployment.) Jury selection in Grossman's trial was originally slated to start July 5, 2023. However, at a June pre-trial hearing the trial date was moved to January 16, 2024. I really wanted to try to attend this trial.

I had promised my dear friend Alene who doesn't drive, that for a belated birthday gift, I would take her to the LA County Natural History Museum located just southwest of downtown Los Angeles. Alene loves history and we've gone to several museums together. Alene has been helping me with gardening projects as I've become physically weaker from my treatments. Since Monday is the day she usually has free, I thought I could combine the museum trip with a trip to the downtown criminal courthouse. I don't believe Alene has ever read T&T. She tells me she has never been inside a courtroom. I thought it might give her another new experience. She was game, so I started planning.

Since I am immune compromised, the new normal of my life is, I wear a mask the minute I step out of the house and I don't eat in restaurants. I told Alene to have a lunch packed for the cooler and we would probably eat in the car soon after we get to the museum.  I also did not know how long I might be able to walk around the museum so as a precaution, I packed a walker. I've had a walker ever since I tripped and fell in that Target parking lot cracking my left patella, soon after I started chemo, but I've never used it. Lately however, my energy level has started to tank from the drug I've been on since February. Most of my time the past six weeks has been reading and resting on the sofa with my kitty, Butter Biscuit, lying on my chest or legs.

I also gave Alene a quick course on what she could and could not do inside a courtroom. Since we were going to the 9th floor, a security floor, I told her that our phones would be put in a Yondr security bag, so she wouldn't be able to use her phone while on the 9th floor. 

Around 2018, the Los Angeles Superior Court transferred the control of the public's phone privileges on the 9th floor over to the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Dept. To be recognized as a journalist, with phone privileges on the 9th floor, you had to apply for a media pass with the LASD. LASD does not recognize independent journalists that are not affiliated with a mainstream outlet or have not been published by accredited media. So even though I have been recognized by the LA County Superior Ct as being a member of the media since January 2011, I am like every other member of the public with no phone privileges on the 9th floor.

The 9th Floor
We parked at the Catholic Church on Temple and walked the two blocks to the Clara Shortridge-Foltz Criminal Justice Center. We breezed through the first floor security and arrived on the 9th floor before 8am. Unlike the ground floor to get into the building, this security station does not open until 8am.

Already on the 9th floor off to the side of the security station was a large family group with a woman sitting on a walker that had a seat.  Alene and I lined up right behind the security scanner. There was one deputy sheriff already there getting things set up. However, I knew that it would not open until a second sheriff arrived and they ran their regular  tests on the security scanner. We waited. More people arrived on the 9th floor, including a media crew with a camera. I wondered which courtroom they got a judge to sign off on filming. From my experience, there are not a lot of Judges on the 9th floor that would allow cameras, but maybe things have changed. I thought I recognized a reporter but I wasn't sure. After the second sheriff arrived I motioned to the family with the chair assisted woman to go ahead of me. She shook her head but I insisted.

After we cleared security I turned right into the corridor and made a beeline to the bench that sits at the very end of the long hallway. I had been standing too long already. This bench is right beside Dept 101, Judge Coen's courtroom. Soon the media crew came down and I recognized Pat LaLama, currently with ABC. I listened to Pat talk to her crew for a bit before I said her name. "Pat LaLama, I don't think you recognize me." Pat squinted in my direction and replied that she didn't have her glasses on and added, "And besides, you're wearing a mask." I replied, "I'm Betsy Ross."  Pat was visibly surprised. "Betsy!" she exclaimed, "I'm so happy to see you!" She immediately introduced me to her ABC producer, Elissa Stohler, and said, "You've read Trials & Tribulations!" Elissa said something to the effect of, "Of course!" She was familiar with my prior trial reporting.

Then Pat proceeded to go more than a bit overboard in her praises of my trial coverage and implying that I was better than any other journalist who covers trials. Almost rolling my eyes I skeptically replied,  "Pat is too kind. I wouldn't go that far." I tell Pat about my Stage IV diagnosis. Pat asks which trial I'm here for. I tell her Sementilli. Her crew is also here for Sementilli.

About 8:20am, the first counsel to arrive on the 9th Floor is Michael Simmrin, Robert Baker's attorney. I believe I hear Pat ask Mr. Simmrin what the hearing is about. It appears Simmrin doesn't know why this pretrial hearing was called. About five minutes later, Monica Sementili's defense team arrives. I remember Leonard Levine and Blair Berk, but I don't recognize anyone else in their group.  Last to arrive on the 9th Floor is Deputy DA Beth Silverman and a new co-counsel, DDA Ryan Erlich. Beth did not recognize me in the hallway, but to me, over all these years, Beth hasn't aged a single day. She looked just as I last remembered her, sharply dressed with classic heels. From what I'm overhearing, Beth and her team don't know why this hearing was called either.

Inside Dept 101 8:27am 

I scan the courtroom. Pat LaLama's crew sets up their camera in the back right corner of the courtroom. Normally I would sit with the other media but I sit on the edge of the second row so it's easier for me to hear what's being said when the court goes on the record. I point out the court reporter and the Judge's court clerk to Alene and try to listen to conversations going on all around me. I'm not able to hear much. My latest infusion drug has been making my tinnitus worse. Alene tells me she's surprised at how small the courtroom is. TV shows make it look like all courtrooms are large rooms. Most courtrooms in the criminal courthouse have only four long bench rows for seats. (I can't wait until I take her to the largest civil courthouse in the nation, with most courtrooms having fold-down gallery seats only available for about 35-to 40 people.) Beth and Ryan are sitting in the first row chatting.  Pat makes the rounds of counsel and court staff, introducing her producer Eilssa to them. I hear Beth and Ryan discuss dogs with Pat and Elissa.  Levine, Berk and Simmrin enter the courtroom and Pat introduces Elissa to Sementilli's counsel.

8:30am
CBS 48 Hours Producer Greg Fisher enters the court room carrying a backpack. He heads directly over to the media crew and greets Pat LaLama. Greg didn't recognize me when he walked behind where I was sitting. I look over for a bit and he's deep in conversation. I get up from where I'm sitting  -which is a big mistake because I take my eyes off of the well of the court- and go over to say hello to Greg. I address him and tell him I don't think he recognizes me. It's not until I'm right in front of him when he replies, "Of course I do." I don't remember much of what we said, but I do remember him specifically asking, "What are you doing?" I replied that I was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer. It was like my reply didn't even register with him because he asked again, "What are you doing?" Was he asking me what I was doing for work? Did he think I was still working while undergoing treatment for Stage IV? I explain that after my divorce,  I went back to school and trained to be a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). He seemed surprised by my answer. I told him that this was not an out-of-left-field choice for me. Most people who followed my trial coverage don't know that for over 30 years, I have been a self-employed then semi-retired "bodyworker". I tell him it was nice to see him and headed back to sit with Alene. It's then I see DDA Beth Silverman coming out of the back chambers area behind the clerk's desk and realize I've missed some activity in the well of the court.

As a bodyworker, I trained with one of the top body modality teachers in the field, William "Dub" Leigh. Dub was one of two individuals in the world certified by both Ida Rolf and Moshe Feldenkrais. He later trained with Zen Master Tanouye Tenshin Rotaishi. After I passed the California State exam, I worked as a CNA in a respiratory hospital. I then got my additional HHA certification and switched to working in home-health hospice care. After a full year in this new career, I was diagnosed with Stage IV Urothelial Carcinoma, also known simply as "Bladder Cancer". If caught early, bladder cancer can be cured. Unfortunately, my cancer was not caught early.

With seeing Beth come out of the back area, I should never have taken my eyes off the well of the court. I see Beth either handing over a disc or receiving a disc. Pat LaLama was briefly speaking to Judge Coen in the well of the court and I believe at this point it's when she tells her crew something to the effect of, they're not going to bring the defendants out, they're just going to continue. I'm disappointed. I was hoping Alene could see what happens when defendants are brought into court. I don't see Sementilli's defense counsel anywhere. My best guess is they are back in the custody area, advising their client. I make sure to point out to Alene who the Judge is when he is out of his robes chatting with his staff and counsel.

8:42am  Judge Coen Takes the Bench

Michael Simmrin is at the defense table. Beth and Ryan are at the prosecution table. Everyone is waiting on Levine and Berk. Two deputy sheriff's enter and check in with the two deputy bailiffs already in the courtroom. Right after, they turn around and leave. It appears they won't be needed in the courtroom since the defendants will not be brought out. Judge Coen chats with his bailiff.

Sementilli's counsel enter the courtroom from the custody area and Judge Coen quickly goes on the record. He states that the defendants were not brought out into the courtroom. The court states counsel has received new discovery. The next hearing date is set for July 14 and it's agreeable to all counsel.

Judge Coen continues with the matter that brought everyone into court. From what the court is saying and from what I've overheard, apparently there was a motion to sever or intention of a motion to sever by, I'm guessing, Sementilli's counsel, with no ruling today except the continuance. Before he leaves the bench, Judge Coen mentions a case on the record "... that just came down from the Superior Court ... this past Friday." I got the case number, 22-196 in my notes, but Judge Coen spoke so quickly I didn't catch the case name and my handwriting is garbled. However, I did find the ruling on SAMIA, AKA SAMIC v. UNITED STATES.

And that's it. It's over quite quickly. Judge Coen is off the bench. Afterwards, Judge Coen speaks to Simmrin at his clerks desk and most everyone else is packing up, headed for the exit.

Outside in the hallway, Alene and I stand back, just listening to DDA Silverman speaking to her clerking staff about researching this case and the points of law it covers. From reading the SCOTUS ruling later, it's a bit complicated regarding spoken statements by a co-defendant brought in at trial through other witnesses. However, my understanding is, in simple terms, SCOTUS ruled a co-defendant's sixth amendment rights are not violated at trial, by evidence brought through a government witness without naming the defendant who made them, as long as the jury receives a limiting instruction from the court on which defendant they can use that specific testimony against. Read the ruling and let me know if you have a better explanation on how the court ruled.

Beth is talking about a prior case (Tran? Traun? Trank?), that up until this latest SCOTUS ruling, the prosecution relied upon regarding specific evidence that could be brought in at trial against co-defendants. That case only covered non-verbal evidence of a co-defendant. SAMIA went even further and covered verbal statements. While listening to all this in the hallway, other counsel from the District Attorney's office are leaving hearings in courtrooms directly across the hall. Beth has a lengthy discussion with one Deputy DA who many years ago clerked with her before they were hired by the DA's office as a Deputy DA.

Afterwards Pat LaLama asks a question and Silverman replies, "... something is possibly coming out from the DA's media relations office..." Silverman would not be specific in this public arena, only to say that most likely, something is coming out from the press office in a week or so. DDA Ryan Erlich then explains to Pat LaLama what happened in court. Apparently, there was going to be a motion to sever, but the SCOTUS ruling pretty much shoots down any motion Sementilli's counsel was trying to bring. Pat then asks a question as to whether or not the DA's office has identified the unnamed third co-conspirator who was seen on a neighbor's surveillance video approaching the house with alleged defendant, Robert Baker. DDA Sliverman responds there are "several" (meaning, more than this single unnamed co-conspirator) who the DA's office believes knew about the murder plot and may have been involved in the planning. The DA's office doesn't have as of yet, enough evidence to bring charges.

After some other reporters ask Silverman and Erlich some questions, Beth looks towards Arlene and myself, having seen me writing as fast as I can on my notepad and asks, "Are you ladies journalists?" I reply, "Beth, I don't think you recognize me. I'm Betsy Ross." Beth replies something to the effect that she does recognize me. She adds, "Your hair's white!" In my mind, I'm thinking, what hair? There isn't enough to even cover my scalp and I have no eyelashes or eyebrows, but, I reply, "Stage IV cancer." Beth's reaction is immediate and understanding. She knows exactly what I'm talking about. She mentions a close friend and a law clerk having gone through the same thing.

Before they walk away, I introduce myself to Ryan and ask him for the correct spelling of his last name, which he politely gives. Then we head for the elevators.

Down in the lobby, I point out to Alene the several large historical displays honoring Clara Shortridge-Foltz, the first woman attorney accepted to the bar on the West Coast and who first proposed the idea of the public defender.

Heading back to the parking lot, I was winded walking up the two-block incline on Temple Street to where we parked. I was grateful I was able to stand as long as I did and didn't need to lean on Alene for support. When we made our first crossing on Temple, the ABC camera crew was on the corner setting up. It's my assumption they were trying to get camera shots of the defense counsel leaving the courthouse. I greeted Elissa and we exchanged business cards. I wanted to be sure I got the correct spelling of her name for my reporting. 

On our walk, Alene agreed that no one recognized me. Much later, my close girlfriends admonished me about this. They reminded me that I do look vastly different than three years ago, when I had long dark hair past my waist. It's true. I look in the mirror and I don't recognize myself.

                        Me, at my last treatment infusion on June 16, 2023.

Today was a test to see how well I held up for a pretrial hearing. Not bad, overall, but I don't know if I will have the energy to cover the potentially month-long trial of Rebecca Grossman in Van Nuys. There would be much more walking than today if I took public transportation to save on parking costs. At this point, it's too far ahead in time to know. 

 The next report can be found HERE.

 

Thursday, February 2, 2023

I'm Still Here on the Planet... Catching Up, 2/2/2023.

The previous post can be found HERE.

Catching Up

Two years ago today I got the news that I had metastatic urothelial cancer, found in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes of my pelvis and abdomen. I was told that my cancer was called "bladder cancer" and if caught early, it can be cured, but my cancer was not caught early.

I didn't know it at the time, but the oncologist I had was fucking lousy at communicating what the truth was. I asked her what stage my cancer was. She hedged, telling me, "...between stage three and four." She never outright explained or specifically said to me that metastatic urothelial carcinoma, bladder cancer,  that had spread to my lymph nodes, was terminal cancer. Even though I worked with hospice patients, I did not know that.

She also was lousy with getting my temporary state disability started. It took her over six weeks to get one of her nurse practitioners to fill out the paperwork, and even then they forked-up information on it and I had to correct it before submitting it myself.

At the time, my employer really, really liked me, and my department head gave me a gift. They would put me on a company "general leave of absence" for six months, even though I had not been with the company for a year. This was huge. That would keep me on the company books and also continue benefits that I had signed up for, I just had to pay for them fully.  To get that company leave, all the oncologist had to do was fill out the paperwork that I would be evaluated in six months to return to work. That's all she had to do for me, and she even fucked that up.  She didn't complete the paperwork by the company deadline so they initially denied it. I then had to appeal while she got her act together to finish the paperwork.

When I went into the office to pick up the paperwork to meet the new deadline, I received the pages back and started reading them. She wrote to my company that I was "Stage IV cancer. Patient is terminal." I was in shock. Tears started running down my face in that tiny waiting room. That's how I learned that my cancer was terminal. That was in May 2021.  

My friend went with me for my next appointment with her, and I pointed out to her the cover letter she ignored and the mistake she made. She was very embarrassed and apologized a lot. She said she would write whatever I needed. I did get my company benefits extended for six months, but it was like pulling teeth. I started telling my friends and family that Quasimodo would be a better oncologist than this woman. There were several other embarrassing mistakes she made, but what I mentioned here were the most egregious. I knew I had to try to find another oncologist, someone more on the cutting edge. Adding to my discomfort was the tiny cramped treatment room with patients so close together. I was also really put off by the unprofessional behavior of the treatment room nurse who hooked up my IV treatments. I was more professional treating hospice patients that this IV nurse.

Searching For A New Oncologist

I told the oncologist and my family physician that I wanted a second opinion from a specialist at a hospital like UCLA. My insurance finally approved that. I had to get my entire medical file copied and transferred to the doctor I saw because I knew it would takes months for this oncology office to get that together. I have to say, that I felt more warmth and a caring attitude from that urologist-oncologist specialist at UCLA than any doctor I had ever met in my life. The last thing he said to me was, "We're going to take care of you." I thought I had finally found a doctor with their eye on the ball in treating me.

But it was not to be. My Medicare Advantage plan approved the consultation but since his treatment plan was the same as what I was receiving now, the insurance would not approve transferring my case to an out-of-network doctor, for treatment that could be provided at a lower cost, in network. There was no getting around that.

I went back to my family doctor to get me a referral to another oncologist within my network, someone younger, who knew how to use a laptop to take notes. A doctor who knew which patient room she was walking into. My family doctor told me about a woman oncologist she met and she really thought I would be a good fit with this new doctor. She was right. The professionalism of this new oncology office and the old one was like night and day. I was so grateful to be with a more professionally run oncology network.

As a side note, where I left off 19 months ago, I did crack my patella with that fall in the Target parking garage. I had to wear a removable leg brace for about five weeks but it healed in about 6-7 weeks.

10 Rounds of Chemo
In 2021, I went through a total of 10 rounds of chemo. My new oncology office also was a big believer in supporting the patient, first, find out how to pay for it later. They got me DNA testing that the prior oncologist told me, "...insurance won't pay for that."  And they had better tools for supporting the patient. When my hemoglobin dropped low, they got me approved for injections of Procrit. Procrit helps bring up your red blood cells and hemoglobin.

At the old oncologist office, I had four rounds of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine. Cisplatin is a very toxic chemo drug and my kidneys took a bit hit. My one good kidney and my atrophied left kidney were not filtering out the toxins in my blood and tissues very well. This is one of the known side effects of Cisplatin. (Even today, my kidney function is still outside the normal range.) For my fifth round, I just had Gemcitabine. By the time I was with my new oncologist I was switched to a less toxic, and less ideal chemo drug called Carboplatin with Gemcitabine. However, Carboplatin is not the ideal drug for my cancer.

My 10th and last round of chemo was on December 21, 2021. A week after that, my hemoglobin crashed and I had to have a blood transfusion in the ER. The chemo was keeping my cancer at bay. It did shrink some of the lymph nodes, but it did not get rid of it all together.

First time Finding Cancer Cells in my Bladder

In June of 2021, for the first time ever, my urologist found cancer cells in my bladder through a special bladder wash called a "FISH wash." A follow-up cystoscopy in early December, he found a small spot, maybe an inch at most across that he thought might be cancer. He said it needed to be biopsied and cauterized. At the time, he also said to me, "Why don't you get the surgery to remove your bladder, they build a new bladder our of your small intestines also take out the lymph nodes." This was the first time he suggested this to me and I didn't know that was even possible. I told him, get me the referral. I had the biopsy on the bladder spot and the cauterization in late January, 2022. The biopsy came back positive for cancer.

A New Companion

I had been wanting to get a new kitty for a long time. My last kitties died in late 2016 and with my ex going through a heart bypass, there was just too much going on. Then my ex started to go downhill mentally, the house became an episode of extreme hoarding and I couldn't see bringing an animal into that situation. Then the decision to divorce, try to find a new place to live and heal. I had to go to to school, get a job and try to get settled into a life. Then my cancer diagnosis happens. After I went on disability, I thought about it often but the US was in the middle of a pandemic. Rescue organizations were requiring ridiculous questionnaires to be filled out, requiring video of your home space before they would even consider you. I finally signed up for this notification service, that let me know when new kitties became available at rescues, as well as LA City and County shelters. Jun 28, a new kitty popped up as being available.

From his one photo, I thought he might turn out to be a real handsome guy. I called about him. He would be available July 1st. I made an appointment to see him July 1 where he was located, an LA City shelter down past Torrance, CA. That was a long drive for me, well over an hour. I brought my carrier, kitten food, toys and water. I got there and I learn they don't let you into the facility. Someone brings the cat out in a carrier, and you don't get to see him close up, but from the other side of a steel fencing. I barely had a look at him. I didn't get to hold him, just see him in a carrier through this steel grating. I took a chance and said yes. They thought he was 3 or 4 months old. He had been dropped off at the shelter on June 29. They had no history on him. He had his surgery to be fixed June 30th and now I was adopting this handsome, medium hair tri-colored kitty on a hunch.

He cried most of the way home, but it was clear he had been around other kitties and human socialized. He was not feral or wild. I eventually named him Butter Biscuit. First photo of the Butter Biscuit is when I brought him home and second photo, he is almost 2 years old. He's been a wonderful companion on this journey. 

Treatment in 2022
My body had maxed out on chemo. My new oncologist felt it was time to try a different drug, immunotherapy, one of the new check-point inhibitor drugs. These drugs are quite expensive -twelve to fourteen thousand an infusion- and I could never afford the co-pay. Luckily, Keytruda had a patient assistance program that accepted as payment what my Medicare Advantage Plan would pay. I started on Keytruda in late January. (From the chemo, I have permanent chemo induced anemia. I have plenty of iron in my body, yet my bone marrow can't access it to produce more red blood cells. I have permanent, decreased kidney function, that my oncologist says is my new normal. I have permanent neuropathy in my feet.)

In March 2022 I had my first consult with the urologist surgeon. This was now my urologist. They thought my case was unique and that I might be a candidate for surgery.  They wanted to see me in another three months. At first, it appeared the Keytruda was working. I had a check-up scan in June that showed some of the lymph nodes as stable and others shrinking. 

September Scan - Not Great News
My next scan was September 9. The scan showed that the smaller lymph nodes were stable, but two of the larger, "target" lymph nodes appeared to have grown a couple millimeters. The urologist-surgeon suggested getting a new biopsy. I didn't see how they were going to get a biopsy of the lymph nodes that were right beside my descending aorta in my abdomen. He said he would submit it to the tumor board for an opinion. The other news was, the scan discovered a small blood clot in my inferior vena cava. That is the large vein that descends the heart and goes down through your abdomen to your legs and beyond, bringing the blood back to the heart. My oncologist said I now had to go on a blood thinner. For this type of blood clot, it's location so close to the heart, they treat this with drugs. People who get blood clots in their legs, they can use a sort of rotor-rooter technique to unblock the veins in the legs. You cannot do that with a blood clot in the thick vein so close to the heart. I was on a blood thinner I had to take twice a day. And my oncologist said I needed to be monitored more often so I was to get my next scan in two months.

My next scan happened November 29, 2022, a little later than I'd hoped. I got the report a week later, even before I saw my oncologist. The blood clot in my inferior vena cava had grown. The blood thinner had not helped. The bigger bad news was, several of the lymph nodes had grown significantly, one lymph node had grown almost two centimeters, others over a centimeter. When I saw my oncologist December 7th she said that cancer, by its very nature is a coagulating disease, so my disease was progressing. I would have to go on a stronger blood thinner. My choices were either Lovenox or Coumadin. The dosage on Coumadin is hard to get right in some people, so it requires a blood draw weekly. Lovenox is an injection that I would be taught to give myself once a day. I chose the Lovenox, to avoid a weekly blood draw.

My oncologist also mentioned to me, that it would be good to have another biopsy of one of the growing lymph nodes that the urologist-surgeon submitted. My insurance approved the procedure, but it could not be done at USC. It had to be done at a hospital in network.

My oncologist said the Keytruda was no longer keeping the lymph nodes from growing. I needed to go on a new drug. My options were Padcev or to go back on chemo. I did not make a decision that day. Padcev is very toxic. My hair could finally fall out, more neuropathy in my body and I could become hyperglycemic, high blood sugar. My oncologist said the chemo did keep the lymph nodes from growing. The reason we stopped was your body couldn't take any more of it at that time. My oncologist said the Keytruda appears to be keeping your cancer from spreading to other organs. This type of cancer can quickly change, and break out to other organs very fast. So I got another dose of Keytruda that day. 

Another Health Issue Surfaces
The next day, December 8, I started to get what felt like a sinus infection. I took a naturopathic remedy that helped a lot. I saw the urologist surgeon on Tuesday, December 13. I updated the surgeon with the difficulties getting the biopsy scheduled. Looking at my scans, and the enlarged lymph nodes, the surgeon said this took the possibility of surgery off the table, for now. The surgeon also told me that he recommends that I go on the Padcev first, before going back to chemo. He still wanted to see me in about three months, just to see how I was doing, before releasing me back to a regular urologist.

The next day, Wednesday, I woke up in terrible pain in my chest and back. I thought I had slept wrong. And I was coughing. Even taking one and a half tablets of Tramadol didn't touch the pain. The following day, I was still in the same amount of pain. I was able to get a teleconference with my family doctor's office on Thursday. They arranged a COVID test and wanted me to get a chest x-ray. The COVID test came back negative. The chest x-ray I was able to get on Friday, but not in time for my family doctor to review the report. I had to wait until Monday, December 19.

The x-ray report said I had congestion in the middle lobe of my right lung. I was diagnosed with pneumonia. Little did I know then how much the pneumonia would delay everything.

I got started on two different antibiotics that day. One I would take for five days, the other for seven days. The pain in my chest though, didn't immediately disappear. It moved around to different parts of my chest. I couldn't lie flat in bed or on my side. My sofa became my bed for a long time. And my coughing was non-stop. And that amount of coughing is physically demanding, it's like heavy exercise.  I saw my family doctor December 23. She listened to my chest, my heart, did a bunch of other tests and said my lungs sounded fine. My heart was fine. And my pain in inhalation was still there, but not as bad. It would just take time to clear my lungs.  I was supposed to see my oncologist December 30, but I woke up that day in extreme pain again. My right side ribs hurt every time I moved and my low back was on fire right below my floating rib on the right side. I cancelled my oncology appointment. No way I could go. 

I got another teleconference with my family doctor's office. Another x-ray was ordered to rule out new infection. However, the x-ray report came back with mixed messages. This time it said I had infection in the lower right lobe, but the overall report said there was no change between the two x-rays. They wanted to put me on more antibiotics immediately. I had to press the tele-doctor to speak to the radiologist to clarify what he meant.  Fortunately, the tele-doctor did speak to the radiologist that evening and got back to me. The x-rays were the same, however, both x-rays showed I had pneumonia in the lower lobes of both lungs. So much for the consistency in report documentation.

After a few days, I was able to figure out what was causing the pain in my back and right side. I was coughing so much and so hard that I sprained the intercostal muscles that span from rib to rib as well as the quadratus lumborum muscle in my low back. My body pain was musculature from strained muscles. It was not because of infection. I saw my family doctor again January 4th, She listened to my lungs again, listened to my heart, checked me for swelling in my legs. All was good. She again told me that it might take a "long time" for my lungs to clear.

 Two Years Later, Where I am Today: Hopeful
Today, my energy level is not what it used to be. I'm still coughing a lot, but at least my body has adjusted. I don't have pain coughing, it's just physically exhausting. The pneumonia set me back worse than chemotherapy ever did. I'm still waiting for approval for the new drug, Padcev. I'm still trying to get that new biopsy scheduled. 

The good news is, I can still manage to take care of myself. I don't need help showering or getting dressed. I can go shopping, just not for long periods. I can do a small amount of gardening and fix my meals. So that's the positive two years later. And I'm hopeful about this new drug. There have been some people with my type of cancer, Stage IV bladder cancer, who went into remission on Padcev and are still in remission almost 2 years later. So I'm hopeful for that.  And, once my lungs clear, (I'm hopeful that will be soon) there is a second degree murder case that will be tried at a courthouse relatively close to my home, not downtown Los Angeles. It would be very easy for me to get to this courthouse and possibly cover the case. Oh how I would love to be in court and cover a trial again! But my lungs have to heal. I cannot be in a court room coughing during a hearing or trial. The the judge would throw me out.

The case is not a national level case, but it has been covered locally. A very tragic case for all involved.  The accused is a socialite, Rebecca Grossman. You can read about it HERE. But most of all, I'm so happy to finally have a companion again.

 

The next post can be found HERE.