Wednesday, November 15, 2023

Stephanie Lazarus Parole Board Hearing November 16, 2023

 Full T&T Lazarus archive

 
Sherri at home, December 1985.
 
Tomorrow, at 8:30 am, Stephanie Lazarus will have her first parole hearing for the murder of Sherri Rae Rasmussen, on February 24, 1986. The murder occurred three months after Sherri married the love of her life, John Ruetten. 
 
For 23 years, Sherri's murder remained unsolved. Lazarus was arrested for Sherri's murder on June 5, 2009, found guilty of first degree murder on March 8, 2012 and Sentenced to 27 years to life on May 11, 2012. She's been in custody ever since her arrest. 
 
As of tomorrow, Lazarus will have been in custody for 14 years, 5 months and 7 days. Because Lazarus' crime was committed in '86, she was sentenced under California law that was in effect at that time. Back then, the use of a gun only added 2 years to the sentence (25 for murder + 2 for the gun). Today, murder or attempt murder with a gun automatically adds 25 years to a defendant's sentence. 
 
Additionally, Lazarus earns "good time" credit in custody at a much higher rate than if she murdered someone today. 
 
I have been told by sources that in her allocution to the parole board, Lazarus will admit to murdering Sherri. I've also been told that John Ruetten will make a statement. 
 
The current District Attorney of Los Angeles County, George Gascón, has implemented policies that are very favorable to the defendant and not so much to victims or their families. 
 
One of his first policy changes after he was sworn in, was to forbid Deputy DA's from having any participation or input at parole hearings. This means there is no advocate for victims at these hearings that know the facts and prosecuted the case that could counter any false statement the defendant might make to the parole board. 
 
Additionally, a lot of the information the parole board receives, such as the defendant's official statement to the board and other documents are not considered public documents. They don't have access to them.
There is another 'thing' in California law called "youthful offender" that the parole board can put a lot of weight into in favor of the defendant. What do you think the top age is for a defendant to be considered a "youthful offender"? It's 26 years of age. Lazarus was 25yrs and 9 months old when she murdered Sherri. I don't know if Stephanie's defense attorney will present a youthful offender argument at her parole hearing, but it is something that the parole board could consider. 
 
Another thing is, these hearings are all done on Zoom since the pandemic. Because of that, it creates an environment of emotional distance between the witnesses who will be allowed to speak and the parole board. Much different than if you are there in person, speaking to the board. 
 
Will Lazarus be granted parole on her first appearance before the board, with only serving a bit more than half of her minimum 27 years to life sentence? Who knows. 
 
Sherri's parents are both deceased. The Rasmussen family, Connie and Teresa, Sherri's sisters, have gathered a lot of counter-arsenal support, despite the obstacles in front of them. One of the DDA's who prosecuted Lazarus, Paul Nunez, now works for the Ventura County DA and is not bound by DA Gascón's policies. He will be one of the family's advocates. Additionally, Detective Greg Stearns, one of the detectives who interviewed Lazarus in that video I uploaded on T&T's YouTube channel, will also be there to represent the family. The Rasmussen family reached out to everyone who knew Sherri, asking them to write letters to the parole board. They gathered as large an arsenal as they could to represent Sherri. 
 
I did not get my request sent in time to attend as non-speaking media. However, I will be able to receive a copy of the transcript 30 days after the hearing. 
 
Fortunately, my friend and author Matthew McGough DID get his request sent in on time and will be there as another advocate of Sherri and as T&T's eyes and ears. 
 
Send some good thoughts and healing energy to Sherri's family and loved ones tomorrow.

Tuesday, August 29, 2023

Lauren Saene Key - 8/29/1996 - 11/8/2000

 Note: I originally posted this in 2016. Remembering Lauren on her birthday. She would have been 27 years old today. Sprocket

Lauren Sarene Key, date unknown
Lauren Sarene Key was murdered a few months after her 4th birthday. She would have been 20 years old today. 

Lauren was thrown off of Inspiration Point, a 120ft cliff in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, by her biological father, Cameron Brown in November 2000. Fifteen years later, Brown was convicted of Lauren's murder on May 13, 2015. He was sentenced to life without parole on September 18, 2015.

Even in her short time on earth, Lauren was a delight to those who knew and loved her. Her mother Sarah, her step-father Greg, step-brother Josh, her teachers, and close friends.

Lauren could best be described as a girly girl. She played with dolls, believed in fairies and enjoyed playing house under the dining room table. Her mother's best friend Annette said, "It was easy to fall in love with this baby,"

At Brown's sentencing, her brother Josh described what she was like. "Her personality would brighten up the room. She would dance, sing and tell jokes. She would draw everyone in. She enjoyed making people happy. She had a fascinating imagination and she loved playing pretend. ... She would have me play, too."

During the two trials, I got to see photos and video clips of Lauren playing, walking on the beach, and learning how to roller skate and use a skateboard.

Photos of Lauren in happier times:






Lauren and her mother, Sarah

I have my own little remembrance of Lauren that I see everyday. It was given to me by her family. It sits on my desk, right beside my ring cup and laptop. The medallion says, "Always Remembered, Lauren."


Complete Cameron Brown murder trial case coverage HERE.

Wednesday, August 2, 2023

Monica Sementilli Pretrial Hearing, Case Update 1

 The previous post can be found HERE.

 August 1, 2023

There was a pretrial hearing in Dept. 101, Judge Ronald Coen's courtroom for Monica Sementilli. I did not attend but I was able to obtain an update from a reporter who attended the proceedings. 

The case will be delayed until April of 2024. The only possibility of the trial happening sooner is if another case on Judge Coen's calendar is pushed forward in time.  Then the Sementilli case could take it's place.

It appears Monica's defense team informed Judge Coen that Monica's convicted, former co-defendant, Robert Louis Baker will testify at her trial that she had nothing to do with the murder.

Monica Sementilli is charged with first degree murder in the stabbing death of her husband, Fabio Sementilli.

More to come...

Saturday, July 15, 2023

Monical Sementilli Pretrial Hearing 17

The previous post can be found HERE.
July 14, 2023 

Last week, Robert Louis Baker pled "no contest" to all charges and was sentenced by Judge Ronald Coen to life without parole.

There was a pretrial hearing in the Monica Sementilli case on Friday. I did not attend this hearing but I was able to get an update on what happened in Department 101 on the 9th floor.

Because of Baker's plea, defense tells the court they want a continuance in the case to "re-strategize". The court agreed that this new development creates a complexity for the defense. There was a strong objection from the prosecution team.

The reality is, Judge Coen's calendar is booked solid. Judge Coen offered the parties October 2nd this year or April 2024. There was a tentative agreement to the October 2nd date. The next pretrial hearing is slated for August 1st. At that hearing, the defense will inform the court about their "readiness" for trial. If the defense still feels they are not ready, then the trial date will move to April. The only other possibility for an earlier date is if one of Judge Coen's other cases falls and gets pushed forward.

The next post can. be found HERE.

Friday, July 7, 2023

Robert Louis Baker Pled No Contest In the Stabbing Death of Fabio Sementilli

The previous post can be found HERE.

Edited for clarity 7/9/23 - Sprocket

July 7, 2023

 Fabio Sementilli
Source: Hair Talk

Two days ago, I had been given a courtesy heads-up that today, Robert Louis Baker would be making an open plea to all charges in the death of Fabio Sementilli. I was unable to go to the plea hearing because I had an oncology appointment this morning. My health has to come first. 

Baker pled "no contest" to first degree murder and three enhancements: 1)conspiracy to commit murder; 2)murder for financial gain; 3)using a knife. After family impact statements were made, Baker was immediately sentenced to life without the possibility of parole by Judge Coen. 

Monica Sementilli was not in court for this hearing but according to a People Magazine story, her defense attorney, Leonard Levine spoke to the press implying that Baker will testify and that testimony will exonerate his client.

Sources tell me the prosecutors, DDA's Beth Silverman and Ryan Erlich made no statement in court today. It is my understanding that by pleading "no contest" to the court, Baker has made no agreement with the DA's office to assist them in the prosecution of any other co-conspirators.

Monica Sementilli is now facing first degree murder charges alone. Her trial is slated to start in September of this year. It remains to be seen if Baker will testify in Sementilli's upcoming trial.

The next post can be found HERE.
Other Media Reports
ABC News

LA Times

Daily News (via City News Service)

 

Tuesday, July 4, 2023

Going to Court 6/26/23 Monica Sementilli & Robert Louis Baker Pretrial Hearing 16

 June 26, 2023

 Fabio Sementilli 

Source: HairTalk.com

It has been three-and-a-half years since I've stepped inside a courtroom. The original reason I stepped away from covering high-profile murder trials was economical. I was newly divorced and I had to find a way to support myself after being a semi-retired housewife for 17 years.

For quite some time now, I've been wanting to get back inside a courtroom, but my cancer treatments have kept me close to home. I've missed listening to lawyers argue nuanced points of law, hearing witnesses testify, and observing the jury as well as who shows up to sit in the courtroom gallery. I do love the law. Everything about it is interesting to me. Even though I could not attend, I kept track of the next pretrial and post trial hearings in two cases I covered extensively, the Baker/Sementilli case and Michael Gargiulo until he was sentenced.

Lately, I've been reading news reports and keeping up with a case that will be tried in a courthouse closer to where I live, the Van Nuys West Courthouse. This is the same courthouse where I attended much of the Robert Blake murder trial, long before I started T&T. The new case is the murder trial of Rebecca Grossman, a tragedy for all parties involved. Grossman is charged with two counts of second degree murder in the deaths of two children, Mark (11) and Jacob (8) Iskander. (I will say, that the only other child murder case I covered was one of the most emotionally draining cases I've ever experienced.

Grossman is alleged to have hit the Iskander boys with her Mercedes in a Westlake Village crosswalk and fleeing the scene. (From news reporting on the preliminary hearing, it is my understanding that Grossman's air-bag deployed and the Mercedes shut down because of that deployment.) Jury selection in Grossman's trial was originally slated to start July 5, 2023. However, at a June pre-trial hearing the trial date was moved to January 16, 2024. I really wanted to try to attend this trial.

I had promised my dear friend Alene who doesn't drive, that for a belated birthday gift, I would take her to the LA County Natural History Museum located just southwest of downtown Los Angeles. Alene loves history and we've gone to several museums together. Alene has been helping me with gardening projects as I've become physically weaker from my treatments. Since Monday is the day she usually has free, I thought I could combine the museum trip with a trip to the downtown criminal courthouse. I don't believe Alene has ever read T&T. She tells me she has never been inside a courtroom. I thought it might give her another new experience. She was game, so I started planning.

Since I am immune compromised, the new normal of my life is, I wear a mask the minute I step out of the house and I don't eat in restaurants. I told Alene to have a lunch packed for the cooler and we would probably eat in the car soon after we get to the museum.  I also did not know how long I might be able to walk around the museum so as a precaution, I packed a walker. I've had a walker ever since I tripped and fell in that Target parking lot cracking my left patella, soon after I started chemo, but I've never used it. Lately however, my energy level has started to tank from the drug I've been on since February. Most of my time the past six weeks has been reading and resting on the sofa with my kitty, Butter Biscuit, lying on my chest or legs.

I also gave Alene a quick course on what she could and could not do inside a courtroom. Since we were going to the 9th floor, a security floor, I told her that our phones would be put in a Yondr security bag, so she wouldn't be able to use her phone while on the 9th floor. 

Around 2018, the Los Angeles Superior Court transferred the control of the public's phone privileges on the 9th floor over to the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Dept. To be recognized as a journalist, with phone privileges on the 9th floor, you had to apply for a media pass with the LASD. LASD does not recognize independent journalists that are not affiliated with a mainstream outlet or have not been published by accredited media. So even though I have been recognized by the LA County Superior Ct as being a member of the media since January 2011, I am like every other member of the public with no phone privileges on the 9th floor.

The 9th Floor
We parked at the Catholic Church on Temple and walked the two blocks to the Clara Shortridge-Foltz Criminal Justice Center. We breezed through the first floor security and arrived on the 9th floor before 8am. Unlike the ground floor to get into the building, this security station does not open until 8am.

Already on the 9th floor off to the side of the security station was a large family group with a woman sitting on a walker that had a seat.  Alene and I lined up right behind the security scanner. There was one deputy sheriff already there getting things set up. However, I knew that it would not open until a second sheriff arrived and they ran their regular  tests on the security scanner. We waited. More people arrived on the 9th floor, including a media crew with a camera. I wondered which courtroom they got a judge to sign off on filming. From my experience, there are not a lot of Judges on the 9th floor that would allow cameras, but maybe things have changed. I thought I recognized a reporter but I wasn't sure. After the second sheriff arrived I motioned to the family with the chair assisted woman to go ahead of me. She shook her head but I insisted.

After we cleared security I turned right into the corridor and made a beeline to the bench that sits at the very end of the long hallway. I had been standing too long already. This bench is right beside Dept 101, Judge Coen's courtroom. Soon the media crew came down and I recognized Pat LaLama, currently with ABC. I listened to Pat talk to her crew for a bit before I said her name. "Pat LaLama, I don't think you recognize me." Pat squinted in my direction and replied that she didn't have her glasses on and added, "And besides, you're wearing a mask." I replied, "I'm Betsy Ross."  Pat was visibly surprised. "Betsy!" she exclaimed, "I'm so happy to see you!" She immediately introduced me to her ABC producer, Elissa Stohler, and said, "You've read Trials & Tribulations!" Elissa said something to the effect of, "Of course!" She was familiar with my prior trial reporting.

Then Pat proceeded to go more than a bit overboard in her praises of my trial coverage and implying that I was better than any other journalist who covers trials. Almost rolling my eyes I skeptically replied,  "Pat is too kind. I wouldn't go that far." I tell Pat about my Stage IV diagnosis. Pat asks which trial I'm here for. I tell her Sementilli. Her crew is also here for Sementilli.

About 8:20am, the first counsel to arrive on the 9th Floor is Michael Simmrin, Robert Baker's attorney. I believe I hear Pat ask Mr. Simmrin what the hearing is about. It appears Simmrin doesn't know why this pretrial hearing was called. About five minutes later, Monica Sementili's defense team arrives. I remember Leonard Levine and Blair Berk, but I don't recognize anyone else in their group.  Last to arrive on the 9th Floor is Deputy DA Beth Silverman and a new co-counsel, DDA Ryan Erlich. Beth did not recognize me in the hallway, but to me, over all these years, Beth hasn't aged a single day. She looked just as I last remembered her, sharply dressed with classic heels. From what I'm overhearing, Beth and her team don't know why this hearing was called either.

Inside Dept 101 8:27am 

I scan the courtroom. Pat LaLama's crew sets up their camera in the back right corner of the courtroom. Normally I would sit with the other media but I sit on the edge of the second row so it's easier for me to hear what's being said when the court goes on the record. I point out the court reporter and the Judge's court clerk to Alene and try to listen to conversations going on all around me. I'm not able to hear much. My latest infusion drug has been making my tinnitus worse. Alene tells me she's surprised at how small the courtroom is. TV shows make it look like all courtrooms are large rooms. Most courtrooms in the criminal courthouse have only four long bench rows for seats. (I can't wait until I take her to the largest civil courthouse in the nation, with most courtrooms having fold-down gallery seats only available for about 35-to 40 people.) Beth and Ryan are sitting in the first row chatting.  Pat makes the rounds of counsel and court staff, introducing her producer Eilssa to them. I hear Beth and Ryan discuss dogs with Pat and Elissa.  Levine, Berk and Simmrin enter the courtroom and Pat introduces Elissa to Sementilli's counsel.

8:30am
CBS 48 Hours Producer Greg Fisher enters the court room carrying a backpack. He heads directly over to the media crew and greets Pat LaLama. Greg didn't recognize me when he walked behind where I was sitting. I look over for a bit and he's deep in conversation. I get up from where I'm sitting  -which is a big mistake because I take my eyes off of the well of the court- and go over to say hello to Greg. I address him and tell him I don't think he recognizes me. It's not until I'm right in front of him when he replies, "Of course I do." I don't remember much of what we said, but I do remember him specifically asking, "What are you doing?" I replied that I was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer. It was like my reply didn't even register with him because he asked again, "What are you doing?" Was he asking me what I was doing for work? Did he think I was still working while undergoing treatment for Stage IV? I explain that after my divorce,  I went back to school and trained to be a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). He seemed surprised by my answer. I told him that this was not an out-of-left-field choice for me. Most people who followed my trial coverage don't know that for over 30 years, I have been a self-employed then semi-retired "bodyworker". I tell him it was nice to see him and headed back to sit with Alene. It's then I see DDA Beth Silverman coming out of the back chambers area behind the clerk's desk and realize I've missed some activity in the well of the court.

As a bodyworker, I trained with one of the top body modality teachers in the field, William "Dub" Leigh. Dub was one of two individuals in the world certified by both Ida Rolf and Moshe Feldenkrais. He later trained with Zen Master Tanouye Tenshin Rotaishi. After I passed the California State exam, I worked as a CNA in a respiratory hospital. I then got my additional HHA certification and switched to working in home-health hospice care. After a full year in this new career, I was diagnosed with Stage IV Urothelial Carcinoma, also known simply as "Bladder Cancer". If caught early, bladder cancer can be cured. Unfortunately, my cancer was not caught early.

With seeing Beth come out of the back area, I should never have taken my eyes off the well of the court. I see Beth either handing over a disc or receiving a disc. Pat LaLama was briefly speaking to Judge Coen in the well of the court and I believe at this point it's when she tells her crew something to the effect of, they're not going to bring the defendants out, they're just going to continue. I'm disappointed. I was hoping Alene could see what happens when defendants are brought into court. I don't see Sementilli's defense counsel anywhere. My best guess is they are back in the custody area, advising their client. I make sure to point out to Alene who the Judge is when he is out of his robes chatting with his staff and counsel.

8:42am  Judge Coen Takes the Bench

Michael Simmrin is at the defense table. Beth and Ryan are at the prosecution table. Everyone is waiting on Levine and Berk. Two deputy sheriff's enter and check in with the two deputy bailiffs already in the courtroom. Right after, they turn around and leave. It appears they won't be needed in the courtroom since the defendants will not be brought out. Judge Coen chats with his bailiff.

Sementilli's counsel enter the courtroom from the custody area and Judge Coen quickly goes on the record. He states that the defendants were not brought out into the courtroom. The court states counsel has received new discovery. The next hearing date is set for July 14 and it's agreeable to all counsel.

Judge Coen continues with the matter that brought everyone into court. From what the court is saying and from what I've overheard, apparently there was a motion to sever or intention of a motion to sever by, I'm guessing, Sementilli's counsel, with no ruling today except the continuance. Before he leaves the bench, Judge Coen mentions a case on the record "... that just came down from the Superior Court ... this past Friday." I got the case number, 22-196 in my notes, but Judge Coen spoke so quickly I didn't catch the case name and my handwriting is garbled. However, I did find the ruling on SAMIA, AKA SAMIC v. UNITED STATES.

And that's it. It's over quite quickly. Judge Coen is off the bench. Afterwards, Judge Coen speaks to Simmrin at his clerks desk and most everyone else is packing up, headed for the exit.

Outside in the hallway, Alene and I stand back, just listening to DDA Silverman speaking to her clerking staff about researching this case and the points of law it covers. From reading the SCOTUS ruling later, it's a bit complicated regarding spoken statements by a co-defendant brought in at trial through other witnesses. However, my understanding is, in simple terms, SCOTUS ruled a co-defendant's sixth amendment rights are not violated at trial, by evidence brought through a government witness without naming the defendant who made them, as long as the jury receives a limiting instruction from the court on which defendant they can use that specific testimony against. Read the ruling and let me know if you have a better explanation on how the court ruled.

Beth is talking about a prior case (Tran? Traun? Trank?), that up until this latest SCOTUS ruling, the prosecution relied upon regarding specific evidence that could be brought in at trial against co-defendants. That case only covered non-verbal evidence of a co-defendant. SAMIA went even further and covered verbal statements. While listening to all this in the hallway, other counsel from the District Attorney's office are leaving hearings in courtrooms directly across the hall. Beth has a lengthy discussion with one Deputy DA who many years ago clerked with her before they were hired by the DA's office as a Deputy DA.

Afterwards Pat LaLama asks a question and Silverman replies, "... something is possibly coming out from the DA's media relations office..." Silverman would not be specific in this public arena, only to say that most likely, something is coming out from the press office in a week or so. DDA Ryan Erlich then explains to Pat LaLama what happened in court. Apparently, there was going to be a motion to sever, but the SCOTUS ruling pretty much shoots down any motion Sementilli's counsel was trying to bring. Pat then asks a question as to whether or not the DA's office has identified the unnamed third co-conspirator who was seen on a neighbor's surveillance video approaching the house with alleged defendant, Robert Baker. DDA Sliverman responds there are "several" (meaning, more than this single unnamed co-conspirator) who the DA's office believes knew about the murder plot and may have been involved in the planning. The DA's office doesn't have as of yet, enough evidence to bring charges.

After some other reporters ask Silverman and Erlich some questions, Beth looks towards Arlene and myself, having seen me writing as fast as I can on my notepad and asks, "Are you ladies journalists?" I reply, "Beth, I don't think you recognize me. I'm Betsy Ross." Beth replies something to the effect that she does recognize me. She adds, "Your hair's white!" In my mind, I'm thinking, what hair? There isn't enough to even cover my scalp and I have no eyelashes or eyebrows, but, I reply, "Stage IV cancer." Beth's reaction is immediate and understanding. She knows exactly what I'm talking about. She mentions a close friend and a law clerk having gone through the same thing.

Before they walk away, I introduce myself to Ryan and ask him for the correct spelling of his last name, which he politely gives. Then we head for the elevators.

Down in the lobby, I point out to Alene the several large historical displays honoring Clara Shortridge-Foltz, the first woman attorney accepted to the bar on the West Coast and who first proposed the idea of the public defender.

Heading back to the parking lot, I was winded walking up the two-block incline on Temple Street to where we parked. I was grateful I was able to stand as long as I did and didn't need to lean on Alene for support. When we made our first crossing on Temple, the ABC camera crew was on the corner setting up. It's my assumption they were trying to get camera shots of the defense counsel leaving the courthouse. I greeted Elissa and we exchanged business cards. I wanted to be sure I got the correct spelling of her name for my reporting. 

On our walk, Alene agreed that no one recognized me. Much later, my close girlfriends admonished me about this. They reminded me that I do look vastly different than three years ago, when I had long dark hair past my waist. It's true. I look in the mirror and I don't recognize myself.

                        Me, at my last treatment infusion on June 16, 2023.

Today was a test to see how well I held up for a pretrial hearing. Not bad, overall, but I don't know if I will have the energy to cover the potentially month-long trial of Rebecca Grossman in Van Nuys. There would be much more walking than today if I took public transportation to save on parking costs. At this point, it's too far ahead in time to know. 

 The next report can be found HERE.

 

Monday, June 12, 2023

Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (Bladder Cancer) Update June 12, 2023

The prior post can be found HERE.

Hello friends. Lots to update you on. When I last left off, I was going to see my old urologist on April 24, for an update with him about scheduling a cystoscopy and my second biopsy was scheduled with USC for April 26 at 1pm.

Biopsy & Cystoscopy

Surprise surprise, on April 24, my old urologist performed a cystoscopy. With his scheduler, they told me I needed an update consult first, before I could get the cystoscopy. When I arrived, I did not realize they were going to perform a cystoscopy that day. But that was great. He went in, looked around. He told me that my bladder looks about the same as when he first saw me back in August 2020. He said he did see some low grade, "red velvet" looking material that is cancer. This is not "high grade" metastatic cancer. This was different than what he found back in December 2021 and performed a cauterization in the hospital in January 2022. He said he could do the same thing again for this material. He also did a bladder wash. The results of the bladder wash did not show evidence of  high-grade, metastatic cancer. As I write this, I still don't know if my older urologist will be scheduling a procedure to cauterize this tissue.

April 26, 2023

At 10am I took an Uber to the USC campus near downtown Los Angeles where the Kenneth Norris Cancer Hospital is located. My driver took the 118 to the 5. The LA County coroner's facility is right next door. How convenient. I'm reminded of all the testimony I've listened to over the years from criminalists employed by the coroner's office, as well as deputy coroners as well. The ride was just over 50 minutes. I arrived on time.

This was a nice, small hospital with great staff. After I was checked in and admitted, at 11:10am, a volunteer escorted me to the second floor radiology department. I waited for an RN to come get me. 

At 11:40 am, the RN called me back to ask a few questions. Last time I had solid food, last time I had something to drink, last restroom, etc. I let her know that as it got closer, I would need to self-cath. She asked if there were any pacemakers, medicine patches, allergies to anything, etc. Unfortunately, they don't have a bed for me yet so now I'm back in the waiting room area.

By 12:30pm I'm in my gown and the IV is in my arm. I'm all ready for the land of nod. I was under the impression that this was going to be a difficult procedure. The lymph node they were going to go after was very deep in my body and somewhat close to my descending aorta. The radiologist came by and I learn I'm getting twilight, not anesthesia. I also learned that my urologist-surgeon, after seeing my latest scans, decided to change course and instructed the radiologist to go after the largest lymph node in far right pelvis that is not retroperitoneal. This is the same lymph node that was tested in January 2021 when my Stage IV cancer was identified. 

It's now 2:30pm and I'm in recovery. I was never completely out. I snacked on cranberry juice, grapes and pineapple. I passed on a sandwich, since I don't eat bread. My current special diet is grain-free. I don't eat grain of any kind. During the procedure, I could hear and see what was going on. I could hear the snips of the device. I didn't feel anything. Radiologist was fantastic. Explained everything. They hold onto you for several hours after the procedure. They said I could be released around 4:30 pm. 

My girlfriend was not able to pick me up until much later in the evening so several days before, kinda last minute, I asked my neighbor -who runs a limo service- if he could do me a big favor. I asked if he or one of his drivers could pick me up from the hospital.  He said one of his drivers would pick me up from the hospital and there would be no charge. My limo picked me up, right on time and I was still feeling good. 

After 6pm, I was home and having dinner and still feeling good. It was an easy, fast procedure. When the radiologist first talked to me before the procedure, he explained everything. He was kind, patient and friendly. One of the things he said they do, is after they've collected samples, the device will still be in my body for a time. Before they take the device out, they have a pathologist look at the tissue they collected so far under a scope to determine if they collected enough "cells" for the biopsy. If not, he would take more samples. 

So during the biopsy, that happened. A pathologist looked at the material then the radiologist took the device out of my body. He then told me something interesting. He said they got enough material/cells with the three collections. But when the pathologist looked at the material, they said it didn't respond like tumor material. That the samples were like "rubbery". I think he said, "... like fibrous". I can't remember if the radiologist said it or if I asked the word fibrous. I'm thinking he said fibrous, but I did remember hearing that word.

From the radiologist's tone and demeanor, he stressed that this was PRELIMINARY. It was NOT PATHOLOGY TESTING. However, it sounded like this could be a very good thing and an explanation as to why this lymph node is not shrinking. The next thing would be waiting to hear from the urologist-sugreonwait to hear the results of the biopsy.

May 23, 2023
It took way longer than I expected to get the results of the biopsy. I did not hear from the urologist-surgeon or any of his assistants from USC for almost two weeks. I finally called and asked for an appointment. The first available appointment was a teleconference with the urologist-surgeon two weeks later.

I find out from the urologist-surgeon that the biopsy confirmed the preliminary tissue review. The biopsy did not show any evidence of metastatic disease. The tissue was, like the radiologist said during the procedure it was mostly "fibrous tissue". The report also indicated there was very little lymphatic material in the sample.  The urologist-surgeon admitted he was surprised by the result, but even so, it was good news. That combined with the good scan from March 30th, the urologist-surgeon said he was "very pleased" with the news. The urologist-surgeon also said this means I am back being potentially eligible for the bladder surgery. The urologist-surgeon also said that we needed new scans. I told the urologist-surgeon that my next scan would be 2.5 months from the last scan. It's scheduled for June 14.

Although this result is surprising news, we won't know until the next scan what is the state of the other two "target" lymph nodes are. The one nearest the aorta did shrink noticeably, but the other one near it did not shrink at all. The  non measurable lymph nodes scattered throughout my pelvis and right iliac space did show evidence of shrinking compared to the prior scan.

June 2, 2023
I started Cycle 5, Dose #1 on Padcev. Before the infusion, I went over with my oncologist my latest lab results from May 31st. All my labs look real good. My RBC's (Red Blood Cells) and Hemoglobin keep going up. They are in good ranges now. My Liver stats, Iron studies are all good. There are only two stats that are out of range, my Creatinine (which tells how well my kidneys are filtering my blood) and the RDW, (Red Cell Distribution Width) which is commonly used to help diagnose anemia. The other item of note is the visual appearance of my RBC's. The visual examination of my red blood cells showed Ovalocytes and Anisocytes were present. Some of my red blood cells are different sizes and some are egg shaped. There are several different causes, but for me it's because I'm on a powerful, toxic drug. My hair continues to fall out. It's not enough to cover my scalp now. My eyelashes are gone and I have a few scattered eyebrow hairs left.

With the Padcev, I don't technically have anemia, but I feel like I have anemia. I feel weak. I feel like I don't have any energy. I used to be able to spend four hours gardening but I can barely do two hours. And I don't have a lot of motivation to keep my body moving. I really have to push myself to get projects done. My neuropathy in my feet has gotten worse, but as of June 2, I told my oncologist I noticed a difference in how my hands felt and that it probably is the beginnings of neuropathy. When I spoke to the urologist-surgeon a week prior, he made a point to ask me if I had neuropathy in my hands.

While going over my labs, my oncologist asked if I used their patient portal. My oncologist indicated that when my labs come in, they are uploaded to my patient account. I replied that I rarely used the portal because of all my doctor's patient-portal accounts, (oncology, family physician, USC Keck Medicine), the oncology portal is the only one that does not allow the patient to upload documents.

My infusion went well. The nurses at this onology group are some of the best I've ever encountered. They are excellent at installing an IV with the least amount of discomfort. When I got home, I decided to go to the patient portal and read through everything that might be in my file. There were a few minor things that were inaccurate -that I was a social drinker- when I haven't had any alcohol in over 15 years or more. There was something that piqued my interest and sent me on a search for discovery that told me something that I never knew.

Under diagnosis, it stated "Bladder Cancer (Genitourinary) - Pathologic Stage IVA.

A note here. When I was with my first oncologist, she never told me to my face that I was Stage IVA.  I found out that I was Stage IV and "terminal" when I read what she wrote in documents to my employer on documents that were trying to save my benefits for six months while I went on disability. She never talked to me about it with me. She never told me there was anything beyond Stage IV.

Stage IVA. 

In all my research over two years ago, in trying to understand my Stage IV cancer,  (found in my lymph nodes with no originating tumor ever identified), my big concern was, what were my odds of survival at five years. I had never read anything about Stage IV "A". I never found or read that there were three stages of Stage IV in bladder cancer: A, B and C. All I ever read back then was Stage IV bladder cancer had a 5% survival rate at five years. But now, after reading and researching Stage IVA, I find some remarkable news. Stage IVB and IVC are bladder cancers that have spread outside the bladder to tissues beyond the pelvis and/or abdomen. Those cancers have a survival rate now of 8% at five years. But Stage IVA describes cancer that has spread to other tissues, like lymph nodes, in the pelvis and abdomen. That describes my cancer. So far, my cancer has stayed right where it was found. Over the past two years, it has not spread beyond that location. And the good news, depending on which web site you read, Stage IVA bladder cancer has a five year survival rate of 36-39%.

All this time, I always though I was looking down a railroad tunnel of a difficult to obtain goal. My odds of getting to five years, still less that 50-50 odds but much better than what I though I had. 

Today 

Within days of the urologist-surgeon asking about neuropathy in my hands I started to feel something different in my hands. I knew it was the beginning of neuropathy. So far, it's just been a feeling of tightness that has gotten more noticeable over the last week. I started using my wax machine to heat up my hands. It doesn't cure it, just makes my hands feel better for a while. This morning, the tightness is more prominent. It has not limited being able to take care of myself. I can shower, dress, wash dishes, etc., but my hands don't feel right. They don't feel good. I do know from reading all the side effects of Padcev on the Padcev website, that some patients had to stop the medication for a time or go on a reduced dose. I'll be discussing possibility of either going on a weaker dose or stopping for a cycle or two to see if my hands improve. I don't want to be left with something permanent, like my feet.

Tomorrow I get my next labs, Wednesday I get my scan and Friday is Cycle 5, Dose #3. I'll go through with this dose and hope that I get the results of my next scan in about a week when decisions can be made.

Me, Cycle 5, Dose #2, June 9, 2023.

More to come...


Saturday, April 22, 2023

My Cancer Journey Update: April 22, 2023

 
The prior post can be found HERE. 

When I last left off, I still had congestion in my lungs. I was getting better, but it was a slow recovery.

PADCEV - Cycle 1, February
The following week I started on the new drug PADCEV. The Padcev website states it is not chemotherapy, but my oncologist calls it chemotherapy. I've seen other webpages that call it an immunotherapy drug. This drug was approved for my type of cancer in December 2019, so not that long ago.  Padcev is given via infusion once a week for three weeks then one week off. One month of treatment costs just under $40,000. Fortunately, this drug is covered by my insurance. All I had to pay was my annual co-pay in full and the insurance picked up the rest. There are big side effects with this drug. You can go into hyperglycemia, lose your hair, get skin rashes, anemia (I already have that) and your vitals have to be monitored. In the original studies, I believe at least one patient lost their life because their skin literally fell apart. The first month/cycle went well. My side effects were more neuropathy in my feet and occasional itching on my skin. As always, they monitored my vitals. My liver stats peaked real high but then came back down.

Cycle 2, March
The second month, Cycle 2, started March 10, my hair started to fall out big time. It would came out like a bucket load when I put a brush through my hair. Hair was falling when I was cooking and everywhere else. I finally had my friend Tara cut my hair short, just touching my shoulders. It kept falling out. What I have left today is very fine baby hair that is barely covering my scalp. It's sad for me because I've had long hair my entire life. Better to have no hair and still standing on two feet than anything else.

My lungs were getting better and I took on the task of trying to get that biopsy scheduled at the "in network" hospital. Getting the right lab tests they wanted and a copy of my last scan (11/29/22) to the hospital's radiology department was exasperating but I did accomplish it. The scan gets scheduled for 8 am March 15th. For pre-op, I have to be at the hospital at 6:30 am. I get an Uber reserved to pick me up at 5:45am to take me to the hospital. A friend will pick me up and take me home. It's all set. Tuesday, March 14, a woman from the radiology department called to tell me that my biopsy is cancelled. The radiologist assigned to the case looked and my films and was not willing to do the procedure. The woman told me his exact words were, "It's too risky."  I was totally defeated. The radiologists at USC felt they could do the biposy, they got approval for it. But this radiologist -where my insurance said I had to have it performed, "in network" said it was too risky for him. I didn't know what to do. I was at a loss.

March 29, I received a message from one of the doctors that works with my urologist surgeon. They were asking what happened with the biopsy. I called back and left a message for them. I told them the name of the radiologist at the in network hospital, the contact phone number and that the radiologist was unwilling to do the biopsy, and they said it was too risky. I did not hear back after that.

Other than the hair loss, occasional itching, anemia and neuropathy, my vitals were good through the second cycle. After two cycles of Padcev, I had a scan on March 30. The results were not available until my next oncology appointment, April 7.

Cycle 3, April
Sunday April 2nd, early morning around 6:30am, I noticed a tiny amount of blood on my self-catheter. As the day wore on, I started to see more blood in my urine.  It wasn't until after I had taken my evening Lovenox injection that I realized the bleeding was probably due to the blood thinner. I knew that nosebleeds could be a possible side effects of Lovenox but I didn't have all of them memorized. After reading through the side effects it did state that bleeding from the colon or bladder was possible. I did not feel any different. I did not feel weaker, or have any pain with the bleeding.

Monday morning I called the oncology office about the bleeding. They told me to stop the Lovenox immediately and try to get an appointment with the urologist-surgeon as soon as possible. Monday, the bleeding continued even more so than Sunday. Monday evening around 6pm would have been my next injection, but I did not take it. Early Tuesday morning, (2:30am) I could tell the bleeding was significantly reduced. it continued to improve throughout the day By 2:30pm there was no visible blood in my urine.

When I saw my oncologist on Friday, April 7 to start Cycle 3, she indicated my labs were pretty good. My creatinine (kidney function) was the lowest it had ever been since chemo at 1.11. I updated her on my struggles trying to call USC urology on Monday and Wednesday. The urologist-surgeon and most of his staff were out of Los Angeles all that week. They also said they couldn't even book an appointment until they obtained information from the team that the appointment had been approved by my insurance.  My oncologist suggested I reach out to my prior urologist (in network) to see if he could possibly fit me in to do a cystoscopy. Several phone calls and days later, my old urologist's office was able to squeeze me in for an update appointment on April 24. That's the earliest I could get in to see him. The cystoscopy would have to come later, after I had an update appointment with him to tell him what had been going on over the past 14 months since I had seen him.

The news from the scan was good. The three target (measurable) lymph nodes appeared to have shrunk a bit. One appeared to have increased slightly. My oncologist said  that "could be" attributed to how the CT scan sliced the image. Here are the new sizes and prior for the three lymph nodes.

Measurable Disease
1. Left supraclavicular adenopathy: 1.4 x 1.4 cm,  PRIOR: 1.5 x 1.3 cm
2. Left para-aortic retroperitoneal adenopathy: 1.5 x 1.0 cm, PRIOR: 2.0 x 1.6 cm
3. Right external iliac adenopathy: 3.1 x 2.1 cm, PRIOR: 2.7 x 2.1 cm

Non-measurable Disease
1. Extensive scattered retroperitoneal adenopathy, slightly smaller and improved in the interim.
2. Mild multifocal bilateral iliac chain adenopathy, also smaller and improved in the interim.

New Disease:
None

No new disease was fantastic news. I'm still holding the disease from spreading to other organs. Metastatic bladder cancer can, at any time, break out and spread to other organs very fast.

In the measurable disease, the #2 lymph node is the one very close to my descending aorta. This one has shrunk the most. #3 is the lymph node they went after with my first biopsy in January 2021.

My oncologist said the increase in lymph node #3 "could be" due to how the CT scan sliced the image. I won't know for certain on that until I get to meet with the urologist surgeon one last time. He knows how to read CT scans and could tell me if that was true or not. With this news, I may still be a candidate down the road for bladder removal surgery and neo-bladder reconstruction. That's my hope. For that to happen, the cancer in my lymph nodes has to shrink to disappear. Then I'm a candidate for surgery.

There was lots of inflammation in my lungs. They found inflammation throughout my lungs that the radiologist thought was the "beginning" of pneumonia. Actually, what he was seeing is the remnants of my bad case of pneumonia.

The blood clot in my inferior vena cava. The radiologist report said: "Large IVC thrombosis, stable." My oncologist said that as this clot material forms, from cancer being a coagulating disease, there is actually only so much that the body can breakdown and reabsorb with a clot. She said the reason the thrombosis is stable is because my cancer disease has improved/receded. The fact that it was stable is good news but it means that I still have to be on a maintenance dose of a blood thinner. So I'm back on the Eliquis 2.5 mg twice a day.

Friday April 14, I had my second dose in Cycle 3. I did not see my oncologist that day and went straight to the infusion room.  When I got home I opened up my mailbox to a notice from my insurance company. They had approved for me to get my biopsy at USC!  I was over the moon! My urologist surgeon at USC Keck Medicine had resubmitted the request to get the biopsy performed at USC.

On Monday, April 17, I called USC Radiology to schedule. They found the insurance approval in their records but said they did not have the direct order from the ordering doctor yet. They could not schedule it. The very next day, I got a call from a nurse from Raidology telling me my biopsy was scheduled for 8 am May 1st.  Radiology scheduling had not called me to tell me that. She was only calling to ask about the blood thinner and that I needed to stop it 48 hours before the procedure. I gave her my oncologist's office number so that they could get the approval from her that this would be okay for me.

The following day, Wednesday, I get an email notice from Keck Medicine that a Biopsy had been scheduled for APRIL 26, at 1pm and the one for May 1 was also in my chart. I called Radiology. They said that they scheduled the May appointment in error at Keck Hospital. Insurance approved the procedure at the Kenneth Norris Cancer Hospital, that had an earlier day/time. Norris is practically next door. They're both in the same USC complex. So now I have to arrange rides on a different day and time. 

Wednesday is my day to get my every 2 weeks blood draw for monitoring my Padcev treatment. I was on my way to the appointment when a doctor that works with my urologist-surgeon called, telling me I needed labs. I told him the Labcorp location I was going to in about ten minutes. Through the electronic portals, he sent two more tests I needed before I could get the biopsy. When I got to the lab, I told the staff to also send my regular CBC and chem panel my oncologist ordered to the USC doctor who added the two other tests. So that was quick and painless. Radiology would get a copy of all my tests directly from the Lab and I wouldn't have to send anyone a copy.

Friday April 21, I had my third Padcev dose in Cycle 3. Before the infusion, my oncologist asked how I was feeling and went over my labs with me. I told her I feel that my neuropathy in my feet is a bit worse, my hair continues to fall out and I feel tired all the time. But my labs look good. My creatinine came up a bit from 1.11 to 1.31. This is something my kidneys have done for a long time now. It bounces back and forth from 1.1 or 1.2 up to 1.3 or 1.4 then comes back down again. It hasn't been in the normal range (1.0 or less) ever since I had chemo. RBC's and WBC's look good and platelets are really good. My Hemoglobin came up to 11.2, which is real good and my liver enzymes are back in the normal range. I'm to stop the Eliquis on Monday morning and start it up again on Thursday morning, the day after the biopsy.

Here I am at my last infusion appointment on April 21.  So far, one day, one week at a time, I'm doing okay.

 


The next post can be found HERE.

Friday, February 24, 2023

Sherri Rae Rassmussen 2/7/1957 - 2/24/1986

Note: I'm late getting this up. I had my cancer treatment today. I've received three doses of PADCEV so far.  2/24/23 9:00pm

This entry was first published on February 24, 2016. Republished on the anniversary of Sherri's death. Sherri was murdered 37 years ago today. Sprocket.

Sherri Rae Rasmussen, date unknown
Photo copyright: Jane Goldberg; all rights reserved.

GUEST ENTRY by AUTHOR MATTHEW McGOUGH!
Matthew McGough is writing a book about Sherri's life and murder.
(Sprocket Note: Matthew's book was published in 2019)

Sherri Rasmussen was an exceptional person.

Over the last several years I have interviewed many of Sherri’s family members, friends, and colleagues. Thirty years after Sherri’s tragic death, her absence continues to reverberate in their lives.

Sherri’s life was remarkable for how much she accomplished in her twenty-nine years, and for how humble she was. Sherri was a high achiever from the time she was a little girl. Sherri graduated from high school at age sixteen, college at twenty, and became a nurse the same year. At twenty-three, she earned her master’s degree in nursing from UCLA.

Despite being younger than many of her nursing colleagues, first at UCLA Medical Center and later at Glendale Adventist Medical Center, Sherri’s personal nature commanded trust and respect. Those who worked with Sherri remember her as an extremely competent nurse, always calm under pressure, and a natural leader. Sherri cared deeply about her patients and about the profession of nursing, to which she dedicated her adult life.

Sherri loved her family and friends and was beloved by them. Many people have told me about the profound impact Sherri had on their lives, how she encouraged them to do their best, and how her example continues to inspire them, even all these years later.

Jackie Robinson once said, “A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives.” By this measure, it makes perfect sense that Sherri is remembered so fondly by so many.

Thursday, February 2, 2023

I'm Still Here on the Planet... Catching Up, 2/2/2023.

The previous post can be found HERE.

Catching Up

Two years ago today I got the news that I had metastatic urothelial cancer, found in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes of my pelvis and abdomen. I was told that my cancer was called "bladder cancer" and if caught early, it can be cured, but my cancer was not caught early.

I didn't know it at the time, but the oncologist I had was fucking lousy at communicating what the truth was. I asked her what stage my cancer was. She hedged, telling me, "...between stage three and four." She never outright explained or specifically said to me that metastatic urothelial carcinoma, bladder cancer,  that had spread to my lymph nodes, was terminal cancer. Even though I worked with hospice patients, I did not know that.

She also was lousy with getting my temporary state disability started. It took her over six weeks to get one of her nurse practitioners to fill out the paperwork, and even then they forked-up information on it and I had to correct it before submitting it myself.

At the time, my employer really, really liked me, and my department head gave me a gift. They would put me on a company "general leave of absence" for six months, even though I had not been with the company for a year. This was huge. That would keep me on the company books and also continue benefits that I had signed up for, I just had to pay for them fully.  To get that company leave, all the oncologist had to do was fill out the paperwork that I would be evaluated in six months to return to work. That's all she had to do for me, and she even fucked that up.  She didn't complete the paperwork by the company deadline so they initially denied it. I then had to appeal while she got her act together to finish the paperwork.

When I went into the office to pick up the paperwork to meet the new deadline, I received the pages back and started reading them. She wrote to my company that I was "Stage IV cancer. Patient is terminal." I was in shock. Tears started running down my face in that tiny waiting room. That's how I learned that my cancer was terminal. That was in May 2021.  

My friend went with me for my next appointment with her, and I pointed out to her the cover letter she ignored and the mistake she made. She was very embarrassed and apologized a lot. She said she would write whatever I needed. I did get my company benefits extended for six months, but it was like pulling teeth. I started telling my friends and family that Quasimodo would be a better oncologist than this woman. There were several other embarrassing mistakes she made, but what I mentioned here were the most egregious. I knew I had to try to find another oncologist, someone more on the cutting edge. Adding to my discomfort was the tiny cramped treatment room with patients so close together. I was also really put off by the unprofessional behavior of the treatment room nurse who hooked up my IV treatments. I was more professional treating hospice patients that this IV nurse.

Searching For A New Oncologist

I told the oncologist and my family physician that I wanted a second opinion from a specialist at a hospital like UCLA. My insurance finally approved that. I had to get my entire medical file copied and transferred to the doctor I saw because I knew it would takes months for this oncology office to get that together. I have to say, that I felt more warmth and a caring attitude from that urologist-oncologist specialist at UCLA than any doctor I had ever met in my life. The last thing he said to me was, "We're going to take care of you." I thought I had finally found a doctor with their eye on the ball in treating me.

But it was not to be. My Medicare Advantage plan approved the consultation but since his treatment plan was the same as what I was receiving now, the insurance would not approve transferring my case to an out-of-network doctor, for treatment that could be provided at a lower cost, in network. There was no getting around that.

I went back to my family doctor to get me a referral to another oncologist within my network, someone younger, who knew how to use a laptop to take notes. A doctor who knew which patient room she was walking into. My family doctor told me about a woman oncologist she met and she really thought I would be a good fit with this new doctor. She was right. The professionalism of this new oncology office and the old one was like night and day. I was so grateful to be with a more professionally run oncology network.

As a side note, where I left off 19 months ago, I did crack my patella with that fall in the Target parking garage. I had to wear a removable leg brace for about five weeks but it healed in about 6-7 weeks.

10 Rounds of Chemo
In 2021, I went through a total of 10 rounds of chemo. My new oncology office also was a big believer in supporting the patient, first, find out how to pay for it later. They got me DNA testing that the prior oncologist told me, "...insurance won't pay for that."  And they had better tools for supporting the patient. When my hemoglobin dropped low, they got me approved for injections of Procrit. Procrit helps bring up your red blood cells and hemoglobin.

At the old oncologist office, I had four rounds of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine. Cisplatin is a very toxic chemo drug and my kidneys took a bit hit. My one good kidney and my atrophied left kidney were not filtering out the toxins in my blood and tissues very well. This is one of the known side effects of Cisplatin. (Even today, my kidney function is still outside the normal range.) For my fifth round, I just had Gemcitabine. By the time I was with my new oncologist I was switched to a less toxic, and less ideal chemo drug called Carboplatin with Gemcitabine. However, Carboplatin is not the ideal drug for my cancer.

My 10th and last round of chemo was on December 21, 2021. A week after that, my hemoglobin crashed and I had to have a blood transfusion in the ER. The chemo was keeping my cancer at bay. It did shrink some of the lymph nodes, but it did not get rid of it all together.

First time Finding Cancer Cells in my Bladder

In June of 2021, for the first time ever, my urologist found cancer cells in my bladder through a special bladder wash called a "FISH wash." A follow-up cystoscopy in early December, he found a small spot, maybe an inch at most across that he thought might be cancer. He said it needed to be biopsied and cauterized. At the time, he also said to me, "Why don't you get the surgery to remove your bladder, they build a new bladder our of your small intestines also take out the lymph nodes." This was the first time he suggested this to me and I didn't know that was even possible. I told him, get me the referral. I had the biopsy on the bladder spot and the cauterization in late January, 2022. The biopsy came back positive for cancer.

A New Companion

I had been wanting to get a new kitty for a long time. My last kitties died in late 2016 and with my ex going through a heart bypass, there was just too much going on. Then my ex started to go downhill mentally, the house became an episode of extreme hoarding and I couldn't see bringing an animal into that situation. Then the decision to divorce, try to find a new place to live and heal. I had to go to to school, get a job and try to get settled into a life. Then my cancer diagnosis happens. After I went on disability, I thought about it often but the US was in the middle of a pandemic. Rescue organizations were requiring ridiculous questionnaires to be filled out, requiring video of your home space before they would even consider you. I finally signed up for this notification service, that let me know when new kitties became available at rescues, as well as LA City and County shelters. Jun 28, a new kitty popped up as being available.

From his one photo, I thought he might turn out to be a real handsome guy. I called about him. He would be available July 1st. I made an appointment to see him July 1 where he was located, an LA City shelter down past Torrance, CA. That was a long drive for me, well over an hour. I brought my carrier, kitten food, toys and water. I got there and I learn they don't let you into the facility. Someone brings the cat out in a carrier, and you don't get to see him close up, but from the other side of a steel fencing. I barely had a look at him. I didn't get to hold him, just see him in a carrier through this steel grating. I took a chance and said yes. They thought he was 3 or 4 months old. He had been dropped off at the shelter on June 29. They had no history on him. He had his surgery to be fixed June 30th and now I was adopting this handsome, medium hair tri-colored kitty on a hunch.

He cried most of the way home, but it was clear he had been around other kitties and human socialized. He was not feral or wild. I eventually named him Butter Biscuit. First photo of the Butter Biscuit is when I brought him home and second photo, he is almost 2 years old. He's been a wonderful companion on this journey. 

Treatment in 2022
My body had maxed out on chemo. My new oncologist felt it was time to try a different drug, immunotherapy, one of the new check-point inhibitor drugs. These drugs are quite expensive -twelve to fourteen thousand an infusion- and I could never afford the co-pay. Luckily, Keytruda had a patient assistance program that accepted as payment what my Medicare Advantage Plan would pay. I started on Keytruda in late January. (From the chemo, I have permanent chemo induced anemia. I have plenty of iron in my body, yet my bone marrow can't access it to produce more red blood cells. I have permanent, decreased kidney function, that my oncologist says is my new normal. I have permanent neuropathy in my feet.)

In March 2022 I had my first consult with the urologist surgeon. This was now my urologist. They thought my case was unique and that I might be a candidate for surgery.  They wanted to see me in another three months. At first, it appeared the Keytruda was working. I had a check-up scan in June that showed some of the lymph nodes as stable and others shrinking. 

September Scan - Not Great News
My next scan was September 9. The scan showed that the smaller lymph nodes were stable, but two of the larger, "target" lymph nodes appeared to have grown a couple millimeters. The urologist-surgeon suggested getting a new biopsy. I didn't see how they were going to get a biopsy of the lymph nodes that were right beside my descending aorta in my abdomen. He said he would submit it to the tumor board for an opinion. The other news was, the scan discovered a small blood clot in my inferior vena cava. That is the large vein that descends the heart and goes down through your abdomen to your legs and beyond, bringing the blood back to the heart. My oncologist said I now had to go on a blood thinner. For this type of blood clot, it's location so close to the heart, they treat this with drugs. People who get blood clots in their legs, they can use a sort of rotor-rooter technique to unblock the veins in the legs. You cannot do that with a blood clot in the thick vein so close to the heart. I was on a blood thinner I had to take twice a day. And my oncologist said I needed to be monitored more often so I was to get my next scan in two months.

My next scan happened November 29, 2022, a little later than I'd hoped. I got the report a week later, even before I saw my oncologist. The blood clot in my inferior vena cava had grown. The blood thinner had not helped. The bigger bad news was, several of the lymph nodes had grown significantly, one lymph node had grown almost two centimeters, others over a centimeter. When I saw my oncologist December 7th she said that cancer, by its very nature is a coagulating disease, so my disease was progressing. I would have to go on a stronger blood thinner. My choices were either Lovenox or Coumadin. The dosage on Coumadin is hard to get right in some people, so it requires a blood draw weekly. Lovenox is an injection that I would be taught to give myself once a day. I chose the Lovenox, to avoid a weekly blood draw.

My oncologist also mentioned to me, that it would be good to have another biopsy of one of the growing lymph nodes that the urologist-surgeon submitted. My insurance approved the procedure, but it could not be done at USC. It had to be done at a hospital in network.

My oncologist said the Keytruda was no longer keeping the lymph nodes from growing. I needed to go on a new drug. My options were Padcev or to go back on chemo. I did not make a decision that day. Padcev is very toxic. My hair could finally fall out, more neuropathy in my body and I could become hyperglycemic, high blood sugar. My oncologist said the chemo did keep the lymph nodes from growing. The reason we stopped was your body couldn't take any more of it at that time. My oncologist said the Keytruda appears to be keeping your cancer from spreading to other organs. This type of cancer can quickly change, and break out to other organs very fast. So I got another dose of Keytruda that day. 

Another Health Issue Surfaces
The next day, December 8, I started to get what felt like a sinus infection. I took a naturopathic remedy that helped a lot. I saw the urologist surgeon on Tuesday, December 13. I updated the surgeon with the difficulties getting the biopsy scheduled. Looking at my scans, and the enlarged lymph nodes, the surgeon said this took the possibility of surgery off the table, for now. The surgeon also told me that he recommends that I go on the Padcev first, before going back to chemo. He still wanted to see me in about three months, just to see how I was doing, before releasing me back to a regular urologist.

The next day, Wednesday, I woke up in terrible pain in my chest and back. I thought I had slept wrong. And I was coughing. Even taking one and a half tablets of Tramadol didn't touch the pain. The following day, I was still in the same amount of pain. I was able to get a teleconference with my family doctor's office on Thursday. They arranged a COVID test and wanted me to get a chest x-ray. The COVID test came back negative. The chest x-ray I was able to get on Friday, but not in time for my family doctor to review the report. I had to wait until Monday, December 19.

The x-ray report said I had congestion in the middle lobe of my right lung. I was diagnosed with pneumonia. Little did I know then how much the pneumonia would delay everything.

I got started on two different antibiotics that day. One I would take for five days, the other for seven days. The pain in my chest though, didn't immediately disappear. It moved around to different parts of my chest. I couldn't lie flat in bed or on my side. My sofa became my bed for a long time. And my coughing was non-stop. And that amount of coughing is physically demanding, it's like heavy exercise.  I saw my family doctor December 23. She listened to my chest, my heart, did a bunch of other tests and said my lungs sounded fine. My heart was fine. And my pain in inhalation was still there, but not as bad. It would just take time to clear my lungs.  I was supposed to see my oncologist December 30, but I woke up that day in extreme pain again. My right side ribs hurt every time I moved and my low back was on fire right below my floating rib on the right side. I cancelled my oncology appointment. No way I could go. 

I got another teleconference with my family doctor's office. Another x-ray was ordered to rule out new infection. However, the x-ray report came back with mixed messages. This time it said I had infection in the lower right lobe, but the overall report said there was no change between the two x-rays. They wanted to put me on more antibiotics immediately. I had to press the tele-doctor to speak to the radiologist to clarify what he meant.  Fortunately, the tele-doctor did speak to the radiologist that evening and got back to me. The x-rays were the same, however, both x-rays showed I had pneumonia in the lower lobes of both lungs. So much for the consistency in report documentation.

After a few days, I was able to figure out what was causing the pain in my back and right side. I was coughing so much and so hard that I sprained the intercostal muscles that span from rib to rib as well as the quadratus lumborum muscle in my low back. My body pain was musculature from strained muscles. It was not because of infection. I saw my family doctor again January 4th, She listened to my lungs again, listened to my heart, checked me for swelling in my legs. All was good. She again told me that it might take a "long time" for my lungs to clear.

 Two Years Later, Where I am Today: Hopeful
Today, my energy level is not what it used to be. I'm still coughing a lot, but at least my body has adjusted. I don't have pain coughing, it's just physically exhausting. The pneumonia set me back worse than chemotherapy ever did. I'm still waiting for approval for the new drug, Padcev. I'm still trying to get that new biopsy scheduled. 

The good news is, I can still manage to take care of myself. I don't need help showering or getting dressed. I can go shopping, just not for long periods. I can do a small amount of gardening and fix my meals. So that's the positive two years later. And I'm hopeful about this new drug. There have been some people with my type of cancer, Stage IV bladder cancer, who went into remission on Padcev and are still in remission almost 2 years later. So I'm hopeful for that.  And, once my lungs clear, (I'm hopeful that will be soon) there is a second degree murder case that will be tried at a courthouse relatively close to my home, not downtown Los Angeles. It would be very easy for me to get to this courthouse and possibly cover the case. Oh how I would love to be in court and cover a trial again! But my lungs have to heal. I cannot be in a court room coughing during a hearing or trial. The the judge would throw me out.

The case is not a national level case, but it has been covered locally. A very tragic case for all involved.  The accused is a socialite, Rebecca Grossman. You can read about it HERE. But most of all, I'm so happy to finally have a companion again.

 

The next post can be found HERE.